Thanks for the review. -ethan
Alok Aggarwal wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Ethan Quach wrote: > >> >> >> Susan Sohn wrote: >>> Hi Ethan, >>> >>> It looks ok, but I'd suggest the following wording change: >>> >>> Due to dependency issues, SUNWcsd and SUNWcs >>> must be listed first in the package list, >>> after entire, and SUNWcsd must precede SUNWcs >>> >>> -> >>> >>> Due to dependency issues, entire must be listed first >>> in the package list, followed by SUNWcsd, and then SUNWcs. >> >> Sounds fine to me. I'll accept. >> In addition, I'll add a follow on line to clarify: >> >> Due to dependency issues, entire must be listed first in >> the package list, followed by SUNWcsd, and then SUNWcs. >> Any additional packages must be listed after SUNWcs. >> >> >> (Alok, does that sound okay to you?) > > That works for me. > > Alok
