On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 05:58 -0700, Gary Mills wrote: > > To tell the truth, I am not quite convinced we should > > allow TI implicitly > > label disk, I think it should be controlled by the > > consumer instead. > > I remember there was some discussion about this that > > we might inadvertently > > destroy user's data. CCing Sundar, since if I > > remember correctly, > > he was raising those concerns. > > You have to make sure that it works on new disks. > On SPARC, a new disk will not have a Solaris label. fix checks this > On x86, a new disk will not have a Solaris fdisk partition. I can try to implement this check for x86, if all think that this is enough > Those cases should be easy to recognize. > What happens if there's a previous install of Solaris > on the disk?
-- ::alhazred
