Hi Sue.

Thanks for taking care of this.  Here is my feedback:
*
*Un-explicitly-listed files: OK
*
*manifestfile.html:

Hmmm... There are refs to OpenSolaris 2008.11in this doc and we are 
making this change after that release...  Changing bootroot references 
here introduce a sort of inconsistency w.r.t. the release. 

Still, this should be OK because the SPARC effort is just for a 
development build.  The release will be changed, I'm sure, before the 
code is officially released.

So... OK.

installadm.c:

372: Yes, I know this code is correct, but I would prefer instead of
    if (! stat() && ... )
to see
    if (stat == 0) && ...

because stat returns an int and because people won't have to go to K&R 
and look up that ! is higher precedence than &&.

378: MSG_UNABLE_TO_DETERMINE_TYPE can be made more explicit by calling 
it MSG_UNABLE_TO_DETERMINE_ARCH.

installadm.h:

115: same request as above for installadm.c

116: OK, so I see why you used "type".  Still I think "arch" is 
appropriate and more explicit.

    Thanks,
    Jack



On 01/15/09 11:27, Susan Sohn wrote:
> Please review the changes for:
>
> 5787 microroot name shouldn't be ISA specific
> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=5787
>
> and
>
> 5789 Sticky bit on bootroot file
> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=5789
>
> which are posted at:
>
> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~sohn/5787_5789
>
> Thanks,
> Sue
>
> _______________________________________________
> caiman-discuss mailing list
> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/caiman-discuss/attachments/20090115/5ac59db1/attachment.html>

Reply via email to