Hi Ginnie,

Yes verifyXML.py just got that tabbing fix.

The reason for calling out the StringIO bits is due how it's different
than a generic file object. StringIO emulates a file but using a string as
the backing store. In particular, with how errors are currently handled,
this means an error message may not be able to have a reasonable user
meaningful reference to a file, if the error happens in an XML "file"
backed by a StringIO object.

The XML Tree object is from the LXML package. To clarify that I changed
the wording to LXML XML Tree object.

I also standardized the two comments, as I had two different structures
which was a mess.

Please let me know what you think, the new webrev is at
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~clayb/bug4606/webrev1

                                                        Thank you,
                                                        Clay

On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Virginia Wray wrote:

> Hi Clay -
>
> verifyXML.py - looks ok. It doesn't look like you made any changes other
> than to correct the tabbing/spacing?
>
> publish-manifest.py -
> lines 744 - 746:
> I'm not sure I understand the significance of calling out the StringIO
> in the comment, but maybe this is partially because I'm not that
> familiar with python. Couldn't you just say that the input is a file
> path? And then say the output is is XML Tree Object on success or raises
> SystemExit on error and prints the name of the file (if available?).
>
> I'm curious - what is the XML Tree object being returned?
>
> The rest looks ok.
>
> thx,
> ginnie
>
>
>
> On 12/08/08 15:46, Clay Baenziger wrote:
> > Haha, thank you Tim. No it was just to see if my mind was being read. Now
> > that I know my mind is leaky but only running into the storm drain, here's
> > the URL:
> > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~clayb/bug4606/webrev/
> >                                                             Thank you,
> >                                                             Clay
> >
> > On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Tim Knitter wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Clay,
> >>
> >> Does this come with separate URL gift in another thread? ;-)
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Tim
> >>
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>   This is a pretty straight forward bug fix for the number of
> >>> parameters to verifySCmanifest() passed on line 624, and to correctly use
> >>> a name value passed to verifySCmanifest(). Similarly, I've fixed a
> >>> formatting/style error on line 40 of verifyXML.py and added more to the
> >>> comments of verifySCmanifest() and verifyAImanifest().
> >>>                                                   Thank you,
> >>>                                                   Clay
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> caiman-discuss mailing list
> >>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
> >>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
> >>>
> > _______________________________________________
> > caiman-discuss mailing list
> > caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
> > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
> >
>
>
> --
>
>               Ginnie
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to