Jean McCormack wrote: > Dave Miner wrote: >> Jean McCormack wrote: >> >>> Karen and anyone else please review: >>> >>> http://cr.opensolaris.org/~jeanm/slim_sparc/ >>> >>> I believe the appropriate defect is: >>> http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=4230 >>> >>> Yes, I'll need to commit with this for the comments. >>> >>> >> >> DC_defs.py: >> Is there a reason to not just switch to a generic name for the boot >> archive? We're not going to build multiple ISA's into the same image, >> so an ISA-specific name seems unnecessary to retain. >> > Is just plain old microroot OK? I thought we needed to keep the ISA > specific name, thus > the change. >
boot_archive is what we use for the installed boot archive, perhaps that would be a better answer. Dave
