Hi Jean,

IMO, the packages should be moved up higher, because that's one of the
more commonly modified item, and it would be more confusing for ppl
to have to find it.

I would do:

img_params
    build_area
    packages
    post_install_remove_packages
    live-img-compression_type
    grub_men_modification
    generate_ips_search_index
    bootroot_contents
    output_image
          finalizer

Thanks,

--Karen

Jean McCormack wrote:
> Sure. See the sample slim_cd.xml that is attached.
>
> Jean
>
> Dave Miner wrote:
>> Jean McCormack wrote:
>>> Bug 5364 Example manifest should be organized for easy customization
>>>
>>> raises the issue that the manifests could be organized better to enable
>>> people to more easily locate the few options that are likely to be 
>>> modified.
>>>
>>> Here's my proposal:
>>>
>>> The areas that are hard to locate are in img_params so those are the 
>>> ones I'm
>>> looking at moving.
>>>
>>> Current format:
>>> img_params
>>>     packages
>>>     post_install_remove_packages
>>>     generate_ips_search_index
>>>     bootroot_contents
>>>     live-img_compression_type
>>>     build_area
>>>     grub_menu_modifications
>>>     output_image
>>>           finalizer
>>>
>>>
>>> The issue is that bootroot_contents is so long that anything after 
>>> it is hard to find.
>>> So what I think I'd like to do is move the small items to the top 
>>> and leave packages
>>> and bootroot_contents near the bottom. Since the 
>>> output_image/finalizer scripts
>>> are also largish I'll leave those last.
>>>
>>> Here's what I'm thinking
>>>
>>> img_params
>>>     build_area
>>>     live-img-compression_type
>>>     grub_men_modification
>>>     generate_ips_search_index
>>>     packages
>>>     post_install_remove_packages
>>>     bootroot_contents
>>>     output_image
>>>           finalizer
>>>
>>> Does this sound OK to everyone?
>>>
>>
>> Please provide an example organized this way.
>>
>> Dave
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> caiman-discuss mailing list
> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss


Reply via email to