Dave Miner wrote: > >> So, I can see where there are some cases where ICT's are common and it >> is possible we need to have a Common Application Class to encapsulate >> these. We do have work scheduled to evaluate the ICT's we currently >> have, try to understand can be done via IPS or system >> configuration(eSMF) or other ways, what is common, what is media >> specific, etc... So, for now there is nothing in the architecture for >> this certainly we haven't forgotten. We just need to do a bit more >> research. >> > > This is a case where the architecture expressed in the document > shouldn't be taken too literally. We'd fully expect that some Instance > Configuration elements will be shared, while others will not be. Once > we get into design and implementation this will likely translate into > multiple classes and multiple checkpoints in the execution.
Yes, I agree with this. sarah **** > > Dave > _______________________________________________ > caiman-discuss mailing list > caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss
