Thanks. Jean
Rokh Wang wrote: > jeanm wrote: >> Rokh, >> >> As part of the install extended partition project we are fixing bug >> 6483812 . So now p0 will refer to the whole disk as it should. p1-p4 >> will be the primary/extended partitions and p5-p36 will be the >> logical partitions. You will need to adjust your partition numbers >> appropriately. By that I mean what you have as p0 is now p1, p1 >> becomes p2 etc. >> > > I have revised all the cases with your feedback. Would you please see > my embedded comments below. B.T.W. the attached assertions document is > the revised document based on the feedback from Sue, Frank and you. >> >> tp_partition_003: >> If your partition numbers reflect the actual p# from the disk, then >> the logical partitions need to start at p5. So you would have this: >> p1 extended partition >> p5 pcfs >> p6 Solaris2 >> p7 linux >> p8 pcfs >> p9 linux >> > I have revised this case according to the feedback from Frank and Sue. > Anyway, in all the partition cases, logical partition now is begin > from number 5 instead 4. >> tp_partition_004: >> similar to above. >> >> p1 pcfs >> p2 Solaris2 >> p3 linux >> p4 extended >> p5 pcfs >> p6 linux >> > I have revised this case >> tp_partition_006: >> >> p1 extended >> p2 pcfs >> p3 Solaris2 >> p4 linux >> >> and then after the delete >> >> p1 unused >> p2 unused >> p3 Solaris2 >> p4 unused >> >> > I have revised this case >> tp_partition_007: >> >> p1 extended >> p2 Solaris2 >> p3 unused >> p4 unused >> p5 pcfs >> p6 linux >> >> after the delete >> >> p1 unused >> p2 Solaris2 >> p3 unused >> p4 unused >> > I have revised this case >> tp_partition_008: >> Same change to numbering scheme. >> When you delete logical partitions, the numbering collapses. >> So in step 5 you should have: >> p1 extended p2 unused p3 unused >> p4 unused p5 Solaris2 > For the "text installer", I use "F5" on "Select Partition" screen to > change a partition type to "unused" to delete a partition. I think > that is different with that deleting partition using format or "fdisk > -D" command. > If "text installer" changes a partition to "unused" just change the > id of the partition to 0 or a number that represents "unused", the > numbering will not collapse, if not the numbering will collapse. > I need to ask Sue how she implements changing a partition to "unused". > >> tp_partition_009: >> same change to the numbering scheme. >> > I have revised this case >> tp_partition_010: >> same change to numbering scheme. >> >> Why does p6 (really p7) show up in step 8? > This case has been deleted according to the feedback from Sue and Frank. >> >> tp_partition_011: >> same numbering scheme change. >> >> step 6: you have p2 (p3) listed twice. Remove the bottom one I think. > I have revised this case >> >> tp_partition_012: >> same numbering scheme change. >> >> Is step 13 legal? If you delete the extended partition to 25% but the >> logical partitions add to 30% I'm not sure >> it should let you do this. If it does, what happens to the LPs? >> > According to the redesign by Frank, I have deleted this assertion. Now > the resizing of primary and extended partition is combined to > assertion tp_partition_11. >> >> tp_partition_013: >> same numbering scheme change. >> >> step 1 >> You can't create this format. The first lp will be p4 (p5) not p5 >> (p6) as you have it. >> You also can't have the unused between the lps. >> >> step 4 and 6: your extended partition disappeared. >> > Still the problem that how "unused" partition is implemented. I need > to ask Sue about it. Since if an unused partition that id of it is 0 > or a number that represents "unused", unused lps can be created > between lps. >> >> tp_partition_014: >> same numbering scheme change >> > I have revised this case >> tp_partition_015: >> same numbering scheme change >> > I have revised this case >> tp_partition_016: >> same numbering scheme change >> >> > I have revised this case >> I'll let Sue and Keith comment on the actual text installer interface >> validity. >> Nice job though. >> >> Jean >> >> >> Rokh Wang wrote: >>> Hi, >>> Would you please help review the partition and slice assertions for >>> the text installer test suite. >>> Thanks, >>> -Rokh >>> >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> Subject: partition and slice assertions >>> Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 17:48:58 +0800 >>> From: Rokh Wang <rokh.wang at sun.com> >>> To: Sue Sohn <Susan.Sohn at Sun.COM> >>> CC: Keith Mitchell <Keith.Mitchell at Sun.COM>, Andre Molyneux >>> <Andre.Molyneux at Sun.COM>, install team bj <installzone-bj at sun.com> >>> References: <4AB73D82.1040601 at sun.com> >>> >>> >>> >>> Hello, >>> The attachment is the partition and slice assertions for the text >>> installer test suite. >>> Would you please help review it. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -Rokh >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> caiman-discuss mailing list >>> caiman-discuss at opensolaris.org >>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/caiman-discuss >> >
