> On 9 Feb, 2017, at 18:36, Pete Heist <petehe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I’m seeing good latency results for Cake at lower MCS levels (graphs below), > in case that wasn’t already known.
Yes - despite its complexity, Cake has always performed well on latency in comparison to other qdiscs. I gather this time you’re comparing it against the mac80211 fq_codel, rather than a conventional qdisc stack? - Jonathan Morton _______________________________________________ Cake mailing list Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
