> On Feb 10, 2017, at 11:31 AM, Jonathan Morton <chromati...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On 10 Feb, 2017, at 12:05, Pete Heist <petehe...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> It means that both the ingress and egress have been redirected over the same >> IFB device and QoS'd together. > > Okay, I guessed as much but wanted to be sure. > > I can’t think of any theoretical reason for these results. Cake’s flow > isolation should be robust enough to cope transparently with bidirectional > traffic in half-duplex mode. As you say, a C2D should easily be able to keep > up, and at these modest rates I can even discount PCI bandwidth as a concern. > So I might need to try to reproduce it here. > > Does the problem go away if you use a wired link with the same setup > otherwise? Or is that inconvenient to try? I have some ath9k equipped > machines, but they would need to be set up.
Not a problem. I’ll run a spread of Cake and fq_codel over Ethernet at various bandwidths. It will be through their Apple USB Ethernet adapters (used now for management), which are also connected through a switch, but I think that setup should be fine for this purpose. Should be done in a hour or so and we’ll see… Pete _______________________________________________ Cake mailing list Cake@lists.bufferbloat.net https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cake
