Yes should be all repos (even the less exciting ones) in src form. Ideally, a distribution of Cordova would use a Cordova src release to package itself.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> wrote: > There would be the whole business of signing the individual archives as > well (easy). I figure the release would look like the src folder that coho > used to make http://people.apache.org/~steven/cordova-1.9.0-src/. We should > figure out if we want to also include cordovajs repo in the source. > > > On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > >> From my understanding it would literally bit a git archive of a tag of >> the repo w/ no rejigging. (And Coho becomes a tool for distribution >> authors like PhoneGap, AppMobi, etc.) >> >> Jukka/Ross: is that assumption correct? >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > iOS should be good to go regarding "source only", the docs have been >> > updated regarding command-line install. >> > >> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: >> >> I'd like for us to aim to cut an Apache Cordova release. The idea >> >> we're bouncing now is that our Apache releases are source only >> >> packages and we save the binary releases for downstream projects (like >> >> that phonegap thing you may have heard of). This should decouple >> >> release woe, aka coho, from the framework authoring concerns. >> >> >> >> Our next apache board report is dues Sept 5th --- and having a release >> >> ready to go for that date would be admirable but maybe too soon? >> >> >> >> (We have in the past tended to hold off until end of September for the >> >> next point release after our last sprint.) >> >> >> >> This would give us the final checkmarks to achieve TLP status which >> >> would be cool to do for our one year Apache incubation anniversary. =) >>
