Am unsure about relying on hand-massaged notes by Shaz for release creation. What if Shaz goes on vacation and no one does it? Let's just try to get everything automated instead :P
On 8/29/12 10:52 AM, "Steven Gill" <[email protected]> wrote: >That changelog file is just a git shortlog. I will see if I can get a git >command to get rid of names. > >Shaz, I can probably switch coho to paste your release notes instead or at >least point to it. > >On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Shazron <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Also, like I've mentioned before the iOS changelog is usually not >> easily readable. I always compile cleaned up release notes here: >> >>https://github.com/apache/incubator-cordova-ios/blob/master/RELEASENOTES. >>md >> >> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: >> > - I think we should include the directories of the implementations >> > instead of more .zip files, at the top level >> > - remove all references to PhoneGap from the README. don't need the >> > phonegap mailing list link. That would go in the phonegap dist :) >> > - I would also remove the names of the developers in the change log >> > - the wiki link to cordova is wrong in the read me >> > >> > Other than that I think it's good! >> > >> > >> > On 8/28/12 5:47 PM, "Steven Gill" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >>So I have done some work on coho on the src branch in the apache >>repo. I >> >>have uploaded 2.1.0rc1 release onto my apache page over at >> >>http://people.apache.org/~steven/. The readme needs some work still >>and >> I >> >>have to update my tests for Coho. Anyone see any problems with this >> >>release? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Steven Gill <[email protected]> >> >>wrote: >> >> >> >>> Definitely doable. Only thing I have run into so far is that minor >> issue >> >>> with git archive. >> >>> >> >>> If I do >> >>> >> >>> git archive --format zip -o incubator-cordova-android.zip 2.1.0rc1 >> >>> This will archive based on the 2.1.0rc1 tag. Problem is, some of >>these >> >>> repos don't get tagged currently. Specifically, qt, mac, >>mobile-spec. >> >>>This >> >>> causes the git archive command to fail. We need to make sure we are >> >>>tagging >> >>> those repos and have a VERSION file in the root of those repos. >> >>> >> >>> Alternatively, I could add a check to see if a VERSION file is >>present >> >>>and >> >>> updated to the current tag. If not, I could do a git archive >>--format >> >>>zip >> >>> -o incubator-cordova-android.zip HEAD. >> >>> >> >>> Other than this issue, I have an updated version of Coho on my >>machine >> >>> that pulls those repos, adds the readme and disclaimer files, zips + >> >>>signs >> >>> them. Plan is to have 2.1 be an official apache release. >> >>> >> >>> -Steve >> >>> >> >>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Yep a git archive of the tag is all we need. Top-level >> >>>> license/notice/disclaimer files as Steve already has in his >>example. >> >>>> >> >>>> Definitely need cordova-js + the docs in there. Weinre, dunno, Pat >> >>>>says no >> >>>> so that sounds good. What about the hello world app? Don't think >>the >> >>>>labs >> >>>> repo should go in there either. >> >>>> >> >>>> As I see it we need to: >> >>>> >> >>>> - add a git archive of each repo into a directory at top-level of >> >>>> distribution, so we would have: >> >>>> * android >> >>>> * app-hello-world >> >>>> * bada-wac >> >>>> * bada >> >>>> * blackberry >> >>>> * docs >> >>>> * iOS >> >>>> * js >> >>>> * mac >> >>>> * mobile-spec >> >>>> * qt >> >>>> * tizen >> >>>> * webos >> >>>> * wp7 >> >>>> - likely add a README file at the top explaining what each >>directory >> is >> >>>> and that you should package mobile-spec into an app built from each >> >>>> platform to "run" the tests. >> >>>> >> >>>> Sign it. That's it. If not doable for 2.1 then definitely for 2.2. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> On 8/16/12 8:14 PM, "Patrick Mueller" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> >On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> > >> >>>> >> Yes should be all repos (even the less exciting ones) in src >>form. >> >>>> >> Ideally, a distribution of Cordova would use a Cordova src >>release >> >>>>to >> >>>> >> package itself. >> >>>> >> >> >>>> > >> >>>> >I was planning on weinre being a separate release from the rest of >> >>>> >Cordova. >> >>>> > ie, incubator-cordova-weinre WOULD NOT be part of the Cordova >> >>>>release. >> >>>> >Am >> >>>> >waiting for Cordova to go gold before weinre :-) >> >>>> > >> >>>> >-- >> >>>> >Patrick Mueller >> >>>> >http://muellerware.org >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> > >>
