Also, like I've mentioned before the iOS changelog is usually not easily readable. I always compile cleaned up release notes here: https://github.com/apache/incubator-cordova-ios/blob/master/RELEASENOTES.md
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: > - I think we should include the directories of the implementations > instead of more .zip files, at the top level > - remove all references to PhoneGap from the README. don't need the > phonegap mailing list link. That would go in the phonegap dist :) > - I would also remove the names of the developers in the change log > - the wiki link to cordova is wrong in the read me > > Other than that I think it's good! > > > On 8/28/12 5:47 PM, "Steven Gill" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>So I have done some work on coho on the src branch in the apache repo. I >>have uploaded 2.1.0rc1 release onto my apache page over at >>http://people.apache.org/~steven/. The readme needs some work still and I >>have to update my tests for Coho. Anyone see any problems with this >>release? >> >> >> >>On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Steven Gill <[email protected]> >>wrote: >> >>> Definitely doable. Only thing I have run into so far is that minor issue >>> with git archive. >>> >>> If I do >>> >>> git archive --format zip -o incubator-cordova-android.zip 2.1.0rc1 >>> This will archive based on the 2.1.0rc1 tag. Problem is, some of these >>> repos don't get tagged currently. Specifically, qt, mac, mobile-spec. >>>This >>> causes the git archive command to fail. We need to make sure we are >>>tagging >>> those repos and have a VERSION file in the root of those repos. >>> >>> Alternatively, I could add a check to see if a VERSION file is present >>>and >>> updated to the current tag. If not, I could do a git archive --format >>>zip >>> -o incubator-cordova-android.zip HEAD. >>> >>> Other than this issue, I have an updated version of Coho on my machine >>> that pulls those repos, adds the readme and disclaimer files, zips + >>>signs >>> them. Plan is to have 2.1 be an official apache release. >>> >>> -Steve >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Filip Maj <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Yep a git archive of the tag is all we need. Top-level >>>> license/notice/disclaimer files as Steve already has in his example. >>>> >>>> Definitely need cordova-js + the docs in there. Weinre, dunno, Pat >>>>says no >>>> so that sounds good. What about the hello world app? Don't think the >>>>labs >>>> repo should go in there either. >>>> >>>> As I see it we need to: >>>> >>>> - add a git archive of each repo into a directory at top-level of >>>> distribution, so we would have: >>>> * android >>>> * app-hello-world >>>> * bada-wac >>>> * bada >>>> * blackberry >>>> * docs >>>> * iOS >>>> * js >>>> * mac >>>> * mobile-spec >>>> * qt >>>> * tizen >>>> * webos >>>> * wp7 >>>> - likely add a README file at the top explaining what each directory is >>>> and that you should package mobile-spec into an app built from each >>>> platform to "run" the tests. >>>> >>>> Sign it. That's it. If not doable for 2.1 then definitely for 2.2. >>>> >>>> >>>> On 8/16/12 8:14 PM, "Patrick Mueller" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> Yes should be all repos (even the less exciting ones) in src form. >>>> >> Ideally, a distribution of Cordova would use a Cordova src release >>>>to >>>> >> package itself. >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> >I was planning on weinre being a separate release from the rest of >>>> >Cordova. >>>> > ie, incubator-cordova-weinre WOULD NOT be part of the Cordova >>>>release. >>>> >Am >>>> >waiting for Cordova to go gold before weinre :-) >>>> > >>>> >-- >>>> >Patrick Mueller >>>> >http://muellerware.org >>>> >>>> >>> >
