TK> Johann Steinwendtner wrote:
I would like to use G.729 with callweaver. (CW does the transcoding)
What options do I have ? Are there any G.729 modules out ?
TK> If you'd searched the list, you would have found that there are 2
TK> implementations available, one based on IPP 4.1 and one based
on IPP 5.0
TK> (which iirc also supports G.729b).
TK> AFAIK both implementations require a little work on them to
work with
TK> the current Callweaver snapshot.
If there's anybody who can quickly adopt IPP G.729 for Callweaver (for
'educational' purposes only ];-)) ) at reasonable price we can
finance this
job immediatelly - result of this job will be free...
There's works in progress to write a standalone transcoder. G.729 is
patented in many countries and implementing it directly in callweaver
is thus not a good thing. The stand-alone stuff will consist of an
sockets (IP or unix) based transcoder that can be built with
commercial/closed or open source. This solution will allow far more
scalability with transcoding compute-intensive codecs as they may be
distributed on several nodes
roy
---
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tlf: 98013356
---
"Why is it drug addicts and computer afficionados are both called
users?" -- Clifford Stol
_______________________________________________
Callweaver-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.callweaver.org/mailman/listinfo/callweaver-users
