THE DEBATE MUST BASED ON THESE UN RESOLUTIONS CALLING VIETNAM TO CEASE HER 
OCCUPATION OF CAMBODIA .

 

Feb. 27, 1982 : UN Commission on Human Rights meeting in Geneva adopted a 
resolution condemning Vietnam’s occupation of Cambodia as a violation of 
Cambodian human rights. 

 

The UN General Assembly adopted a resolution A/RES/41/6,, calling for a 
withdrawal of Vietnamese forces from Cambodia.

 

"Prime Minister Pham Van Dong called on me and, in the presence of Premier Chou 
En-lai, swore in the name of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam that the latter 
would always respect the land frontiers as well as all islands belonging to the 
"Kingdom of Cambodia" March 1970 by Sihanouk . Wilfred Burchett book "The China 
Cambodia Vietnam triangle " P-176-177

 

June 8, 1970 No details of a North Vietnamese agreement with Prince Sihanouk 
are given following his return to Peking after a two-week visit to Hanoi.

THE ARGUMENT THAT GOES BEYOND THESE UN RESOLUTIONS IS JUST A PURE FUTILE 
EXERCISE LEAVING THE CRIMINAL VIETNAMESE INVADERS WITH IMPUNITY.

 

BURY


 


Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 02:30:29 -1000
Subject: Political Debate between Cambodian and Vietnamese on "Invading or 
Saving?"
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]


Sunday, May 31, 2009
Political Debate between Cambodian and Vietnamese on "Invading or Saving?" 
First, your argument has some weigh. Many foreign scholars have called current 
ongoing trial of Khmer Rouge leaders as "travesty of justice". They have 
commented the same thing like what you are telling me here. But I am really 
disturbed by this low class analysis and alien approaches to describe the 
situation in Cambodia.Post at: http://cambodianbrightfuture.blogspot.com/

4:33 AM and for Main Link of this Debate

I am aware that Khmer Rouge brutality is unacceptable. Now I am insulted as too 
ignorant, simplistic and cocky to understand the current Cambodia position. You 
can say whatever you can express your personal opinion. But be aware that your 
personal opinion is just yours. It cannot be ours. Thus, I am not in the 
imagination world or in the world of opinion. I would like to allow you to 
understand that I am in the real world and empirical opinion.

I am young Cambodian. I lost my parents, siblings and other several relatives. 
This loss has trembled me ever since. But I have never lost to call for fair 
treatment from others, particularly Vietnam who should not use hegemonic policy 
over Cambodia through the expense of our relatives' suffering in their great 
westward march. They should stop try to legitimize their invasion.

First, your argument has some weigh. Many foreign scholars have called current 
ongoing trial of Khmer Rouge leaders as "travesty of justice". They have 
commented the same thing like what you are telling me here. But I am really 
disturbed by this low class analysis and alien approaches to describe the 
situation in Cambodia.

For Cambodia, if we don't have the UNs and international communities, we don't 
have present Cambodia. But what is worse is that "present Cambodia has not yet 
been well solved by the UNs". Cambodia still has imperialistic legacy of 
Vietnam. I know your word is logical and sweat, but I can say your word is good 
to keep Vietnam's "status quo" of hegemony and domination over Cambodia.

Secondly, many other countries like Germany or Japan experienced brutality or 
genocide or race elimination, but after the war, these countries have stopped 
to debate about right and wrong, legitimate or illegitimate to what was 
happening in the past of their countries. Only Cambodia who is using Khmer 
Rouge brutality as the pretext to seek justice, healing, and strengthening the 
rule of laws. Actually, it is only serving the "status quo" of Vietnam inside 
Cambodia. I know your word here is really logical and reasonable to current 
Cambodian political leaders. They are drunk of power and sometime feasibly 
brainwashed by Vietnam. The present Cambodian political leaders inside the 
government, most of them are working for personal fame, money and power, they 
don't care what is going to happen in the future.

These two things might help you to understand more about "real world and 
empirical opinion" of younger Cambodians.

KY
---------------------------

4:33 AM
Le
Well said, the young generation in Cambodia NEVER understood what had happened 
to their parents' generation, instead only looking at present issues like land 
annexing or ideological difference, or political diversion. It's true that 
although we are very close neighbours, we are totally different in every 
senses, unlike Vietnam and China. Vietnam was under Chinese domination for 
thousands of years and most Vietnam tradition, language and rituals are from 
China. But nothing like that seen in Vietnam - Cambodia perspectives. I could 
imagine Cambodia opposition to Vietnam is much like Vietnam's opposition to 
China, but causes must be clearly distinguished.

With regard to the presence of Vietnam in Cambodia in late 70s to 80s, I bet 
most Cambodians weren't tauched how their past generations had gone thru the 
murderous regime of Polpot. The current generation in Cambodia is simply too 
young and ignorant, too preoccupied by other issues so as to jump conclusion 
rather than look at historical context and why they should have been grateful 
of the Viet, including my dad serving there for 3 years. Without the Viet 
intervention, Cambodia was just a another sad story like North Korea under the 
Chineses' chessboard.

By the way, UN is NOT a standard for anyone to take stand. If you look at the 
impotency of UN, the ignorance of big powers, the filthy politics all together, 
I would suggest you that Cambodia is just a mockery of UN failure. Although 
Polpot was convited of the massacre of more than 1 million Cambodians from 
75-79, he DID it with the support of Beijing, and arms from US, UK and many 
other countries simply because they wanted to stop the Soviet expansion in 
Southeast Asia, regardless of how many human lives lost. Even after the 
collapse of the Polpot regime, such countries still RECOGNISED the Polpot's 
seat at UN. What? And now, they made up their mind by asking INTERNATIONAL 
COURT to try Polpot regime, so basically outlawing that regime and REVERSING 
their own position. WTF? If you look at the latest example of Iraq, you would 
know why UN was, and is, a mere tool for some countries to manipulate the whole 
world.

There is no gain or loss for both our countries, as we are too small and often 
being taken as a pawn on the chessboard of big countries, we were ALL LOSERS. 
Vietnam has learnt a lot from its history and I think we have a pretty good 
government in presence. Be soft to deal with contentious issues, but tough when 
it comes to national soveignty. Many young generations are just too ignorant, 
simplistic, cocky to understand the position we are now.
-- 
Cambodian Brighter Future depends on enduring conscience and tireless strivings 
of Cambodian Younger Generation!
http://cambodianbrightfuture.blogspot.com




_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync.
http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_BR_life_in_synch_052009
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group.
This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. 
Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc
Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to