On Saturday, August 3, 2013 7:50:42 PM UTC-7, Rum Tum wrote: > > Dear Kangaroo, > Very well, it is a night time at this moment, that is why you are > confused, be patient until the Sunrise as you see the symbol logo of CNRP. > To answer your question, the election is not fraud, but it not well > organized, there is the partiality of NEC. National Election Committee > compromise CCP, to steal , to buy and to rob the ballots. Despite all > that, CNRP still win, the worst of all, NEC did not dare to announce the > true winning result because of menace during that time. > In my view, it is best to propose a second turn of final election between > Mr. Sam Raingsi and Mr. Hun Sen. I dare say, Sam Raingsi can still win in > any circumstances. > > *Here is where I'm very confused. First you said that the election result was not fraud. Then you said in the very following sentence that a steal rob etc...whatever you are trying to say. * *Which one is it? * *Is it not a fraud?* *Is it partially fraud?* *Is it totally fraud?* *You then said that CNRP won despite all of those fraud. * ** *Now, let us look at this picture. If I'm not mistaken, you said that CNRP won despite of fraud. Did I understand it right? * *If that is the case, Sam Rainsy and CNRP accept the result from a fraudulant election. Am I understanding it right?* ** *Now you are proposing another election. And you know that Sam Rainsy would still win. I'm very confused because you are trying to blame the bad things on Hun Sen and CPP. And you want to have Sam Rainsy win at the same time. All of these things occured from the same election. Which way are we going here? If Hun Sen wins, it's a fraud. Am I right? If Sam Rainsy win, the election is credible. Am I right? Now, let us look back at this last election. Is it a fraud, or not? Sam Rainsy said he won, then the election must be credible. Am I right? So if the election is credible, Hun Sen can win also. Am I right? * ** *I know. I'm making your head spin a little. You are not going to get it because everything is right when it comes to Sam Rainsy for you. Everything is wrong when it comes to Hun Sen and CPP. * ** *My friend, * *Cambodia would never retain the real peace and the growth they need for the people of Cambodia as long as the people like Sam Rainsy lead the people. As we had seen in the past, Sihanouk, Lon Nol, Khmer Rouge, and thereafter governments all have been doing the same thing. They practice the culture of corruption and the culture of impunity. These two elements have lead so many wars against Cambodians themselves of different factions. Sam Rainsy is not any different from that. I'm saying this from the bottom of my heart. If Sam Rainsy is a real true hero for Cambodia, he would be able to muster Cambodians together for prosperity. That is a one thing that I have given credit to Sihanouk. *
> > > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group. This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
