Dear Kangaroo, How can you know that I am a girl ? Rumtum ________________________________ From: kangaroo <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: kangaroo <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; Rum Tum <[email protected]>; [email protected] Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 9:44 AM Subject: Re: Dear Kangaroo
Your behavior shows the Cambodian behavior clearly repeatedly. I gave you my opinion and some reasoning that you seem to ignore. Here it is again. One may accuse of NEC, Hun Sen or CPP have been doing something to rig the election so the result would favor their party. My question is this as followed. If all of these things happened during the election, don't you think that the election itself has been tainted? Don't you think that the result is not what a credible election should be? Are you not agree with me here? Now, it that is the case, why did Sam Rainsy declare that his party had won the majority of the seat. At the same time, CPP said that theyhad the majority. According to my analysis, the election must be credible in either case for those party to declare victory. Let us take Sam Rainsy and his party to the forefront for this discussion. Sam Rainsy has said that his party had the majority of seats in the new congress from that election. This alone tells us that Sam Rainsy has accepted that the election is credible, not tainted. At the same time, Sam Rainsy has raised the issues of irregularities, voting fraud etc...... He asked the government to investigate. This part tells us that Sam Rainsy and his party also believe that the election has been tainted. Hence, the result should be null. If it should be null, why did he declare that his party had the majority? Confliction outcome of what Sam Rainsy and his party have been saying are nothing new. They do it just to raise the issues. They did the same thing five years ago when the international community declared that the election was crediblek, free and fair. Yet, Sam Rainsy cried foul. That is just the way they do business. Now, let us look at the CPP. They have said that the election is credible and they have the majority, period. They didn't say anything about irregularities, fraud etc...... The whole election is in their hands. Yet, they have lost quite a few seats. My friend, If you are Sam Rainsy clans, you should think before you say it because Sam Rainsy has been contradicting himself. This man cannot be trusted. He cried that he was not able to vote. Yet, he knew had never register to vote until he returned to Cambodia. By then it's too late. The deadline had come and gone long before that. Then he said that he was not allowed to run for a seat in the congress. What he didn't say that he didn't register himself to run for the seat until he returned to Cambodia. Once again, it was too late. The deadline had come and gone. If the citizen Sam Rainsy is able to do those two things, thousands and thousands of Cambodian citizens ought to be able to do the same. Unfortunately, they could not. So Sam Rainsy must understand that the rules and the laws apply to all people of Cambodia, not except Sam Rainsy. Why black cow eat green grass and produce white milk ? >Is it mysterious ? You have answered your own questions, congratulation, at last you understand, the election itself was true, the result has been manipulated by NEC, it has become fake and now they are in the trouble, they are trying to purify it. They say oh just because of the menace, oh just because of the media, and so on... they want to escape the responsibility because of shame, so at last they say, it is only the first announcement , not yet official, the official result is that Sam Raingsi wins more than 64 seats >Rumtum > > > From: kangaroo <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Cc: kangaroo <[email protected]>; "[email protected] " ><[email protected] >; "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; Rum Tum ><[email protected]>; [email protected] >Sent: Sunday, August 4, 2013 10:14 PM >Subject: Re: Dear Kangaroo > > > >So if the election is not a fraud, why does Sam Rainsy and his party ask for >investigation on any irregularities? > > >"Let me answer your questions again, if you do not understand my latest >responses. >Did I not tell you that the election is not Fraud, the result is?" is your own >writing. >What are you trying to tell the world here? >The cow is not brown, but the skin of the cow is. >Is that what you are trying to tell us? > > >On Sunday, August 4, 2013 6:43:42 AM UTC-7, Rum Tum wrote: >Dear Kangaroo, >> >>Let me answer your questions again, if you do not understand my latest >>responses. >>Did I not tell you that the election is not Fraud, the result is? Because >>NEC compromise CPP. >>All the election from the first until the fifth, are not fraud, but the >>results are, all the results are fake. > >What you are saying is that A is not a letter. A letter A is a letter. I'm >very confused now. > > >Even Thai TV acknowledges that NEC cheats in favor of CPP, SEE again the >attached >>If not so, Dek Jo Hun Sen is out long time ago, he remains and he resists >>even he loses his election. > >So if the NEC cheated the election, the whole election is cheated. It means >that the whole election and the result all are false cannot be used. It's not >a good election. It means that any result, bad or good, should be tossed away. > >The truth will sets us free from all doubts. >>Permettez-moi de répondre à vos questions encore une fois, si vous ne comprenez pas mes dernières réponses. >> >> >Pourquoi voullez vous comprendre? > > >N'ai-je pas vous dire que l'élection n'est pas la fraude, mais le résultat est fraude ? Parce que NEC compromis CPP >> >> >The da da da the doo doo doo >Inimy nemo Kangaroo is coming to show you. >I'm sorry that your tongue is tied up. All of a sudden, you can't speak >English anymore. >That's ok. That's called " selective orgasm". > > >Tout l'élection de la première à la cinquième, ne sont pas la fraude, mais les résultats sont TOUS FAUX, tous les résultats sont faux. >> >> >>La vérité nous libre de tous les doutes. >> >> >> >>Rumtum >> >> >> From: kangaroo <[email protected]> >>To: [email protected] >>Cc: "[email protected] " <[email protected] >; "[email protected]" >><[email protected]>; Rum Tum <[email protected]>; [email protected] >>Sent: Sunday, August 4, 2013 1:02 PM >>Subject: Re: Fwd: UN rights expert appeals for calm >> >> >> >> >>On Saturday, August 3, 2013 7:50:42 PM UTC-7, Rum Tum wrote: >>Dear Kangaroo, >>>Very well, it is a night time at this moment, that is why you are confused, be patient until the Sunrise as you see the symbol logo of CNRP. >>>To answer your question, the election is not fraud, but it not well organized, there is the partiality of NEC. National Election Committee compromise CCP, to steal , to buy and to rob the ballots. Despite all that, CNRP still win, the worst of all, NEC did not dare to announce the true winning result because of menace during that time. >>>In my view, it is best to propose a second turn of final election between Mr. Sam Raingsi and Mr. Hun Sen. I dare say, Sam Raingsi can still win in any circumstances. >>> >>Here is where I'm very confused. First you said that the election result was >>not fraud. Then you said in the very following sentence that a steal rob >>etc...whatever you are trying to say. >>Which one is it? >>Is it not a fraud? >>Is it partially fraud? >>Is it totally fraud? >>You then said that CNRP won despite all of those fraud. >> >>Now, let us look at this picture. If I'm not mistaken, you said that CNRP won >>despite of fraud. Did I understand it right? >>If that is the case, Sam Rainsy and CNRP accept the result from a fraudulant >>election. Am I understanding it right? >> >>Now you are proposing another election. And you know that Sam Rainsy would >>still win. I'm very confused because you are trying to blame the bad things >>on Hun Sen and CPP. And you want to have Sam Rainsy win at the same time. All >>of these things occured from the same election. Which way are we going here? >>If Hun Sen wins, it's a fraud. Am I right? If Sam Rainsy win, the election is >>credible. Am I right? Now, let us look back at this last election. Is it a >>fraud, or not? Sam Rainsy said he won, then the election must be credible. Am >>I right? So if the election is credible, Hun Sen can win also. Am I right? >> >>I know. I'm making your head spin a little. You are not going to get it >>because everything is right when it comes to Sam Rainsy for you. Everything >>is wrong when it comes to Hun Sen and CPP. >> >>My friend, >>Cambodia would never retain the real peace and the growth they need for the >>people of Cambodia as long as the people like Sam Rainsy lead the people. As >>we had seen in the past, Sihanouk, Lon Nol, Khmer Rouge, and thereafter >>governments all have been doing the same thing. They practice the culture of >>corruption and the culture of impunity. These two elements have lead so many >>wars against Cambodians themselves of different factions. Sam Rainsy is not >>any different from that. I'm saying this from the bottom of my heart. If Sam >>Rainsy is a real true hero for Cambodia, he would be able to muster >>Cambodians together for prosperity. That is a one thing that I have given >>credit to Sihanouk. >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> -- >-- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - http://www.cambodia.org/"; group. >This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. >Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia. > >To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >To unsubscribe from this group, send email to camdisc-u...@ googlegroups.com >For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc >Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org/ >--- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >"Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - http://www.cambodia.org/"; group. >To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >email to camdisc+u...@ googlegroups.com. >For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > > > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group. This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group. This is an unmoderated forum. Please refrain from using foul language. Thank you for your understanding. Peace among us and in Cambodia. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/camdisc Learn more - http://www.cambodia.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Cambodia Discussion (CAMDISC) - www.cambodia.org" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
