On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:46 AM, James Strachan <[email protected]> wrote: > Looking at the 89 issues in 1.5.1, there's quite a few improvements > and new features. I wonder if we should call it 1.6? Yeah many other frameworks etc. that have even fewer tickets in the roadmap will bump the version to 1.6.
I guess since we have stated 1.5.1 in the wiki doc and if we call it 1.6 then end users will still know/assume that this also applies to 1.6 > > 2008/12/17 Claus Ibsen <[email protected]>: >> Hadrian >> >> Any update on when you have the time to cut a 1.5.1 RC? >> We have some rather important bunch of fixes in it. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Claus Ibsen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> I think we should start getting a RC for 1.5.1 out of the door this or >>> start of next week. >>> >>> /Claus Ibsen >>> Apache Camel Committer >>> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Producing the kit is not the main issue. Quite a few of us spend time >>>> downloading the rc, running the demos, looking at content of the distro, >>>> checking if all the artifacts are there, the manual is generated ok and so >>>> forth. This is time consuming. Then there is the voting process. >>>> Sometimes we get -1s for a bad kit (although that didn't happen in a while >>>> afairc), sometimes because a committer has a strong opinion about a jira >>>> issue that must go in the release, which puts us back to square one. All >>>> in >>>> all the process for a release candidate takes 3-5 days. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Hadrian >>>> >>>> >>>> On Dec 1, 2008, at 11:09 AM, Martin Gilday wrote: >>>> >>>>> Speaking as an end user I'd quite like to see maintenance releases >>>>> coming out of Camel. You guys are really great at responding to users' >>>>> feedback and fixing bugs but that is in vain if they have to wait for 3 >>>>> months until the next major rlease. Users can be uncomfotable running >>>>> against snapshots in production, so a fix release every month or so >>>>> would make us feel cosy. As Maven is being used is there much more to >>>>> releasing other than a few svn copy commands and a maven deploy? If it >>>>> is seen as a hassle then can we look at simplifying it so that it can >>>>> happen more often without taking up committers time? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ----- Original message ----- >>>>> From: "Jon Anstey" <[email protected]> >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 10:13:38 -0330 >>>>> Subject: Re: Release camel 1.5.1 this month? >>>>> >>>>> Do you think we need another release so soon? We just released 1.5 a >>>>> month >>>>> ago :) I'm just saying its a bit of work for you to put a release out, >>>>> isn't >>>>> it? >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> There are 57 issues fixed on the 1.5.1 branch so far and a few more >>>>>> coming >>>>>> in the following couple of weeks. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd suggest releasing a 1.5.1 before the end of the month. What do you >>>>>> think? >>>>>> >>>>>> Hadrian >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Jon >>>>> >>>>> http://janstey.blogspot.com/ >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> /Claus Ibsen >> Apache Camel Committer >> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/ >> > > > > -- > James > ------- > http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ > > Open Source Integration > http://fusesource.com/ > -- /Claus Ibsen Apache Camel Committer Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
