Also, +1 for the change to 1.6

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Jon Anstey <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm pretty sure we can just rename the version in JIRA.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Willem Jiang <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> +1 for the use the 1.6 as the new release version of Camel.
>> Here is a question for the JIRA version.
>> Is there any batch tool can help us to change the version from 1.5.1 to
>> 1.6?
>>
>> Willem
>>
>> Hadrian Zbarcea wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Just got back from a long vacation.  Wow, it felt good :).
>> >
>> > Sure, let me take a look at what outstanding.  The branch is 1.x so we
>> > could go with a 1.6 (and I think that would be my preference too). Is
>> > there a consensus on the version number?
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> > Hadrian
>> >
>> > On Dec 17, 2008, at 3:40 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hadrian
>> >>
>> >> Any update on when you have the time to cut a 1.5.1 RC?
>> >> We have some rather important bunch of fixes in it.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Claus Ibsen <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>> Hi
>> >>>
>> >>> I think we should start getting a RC for 1.5.1 out of the door this or
>> >>> start of next week.
>> >>>
>> >>> /Claus Ibsen
>> >>> Apache Camel Committer
>> >>> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea <[email protected]>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>> Producing the kit is not the main issue.  Quite a few of us spend
>> time
>> >>>> downloading the rc, running the demos, looking at content of the
>> >>>> distro,
>> >>>> checking if all the artifacts are there, the manual is generated ok
>> >>>> and so
>> >>>> forth.  This is time consuming.  Then there is the voting process.
>> >>>> Sometimes we get -1s for a bad kit (although that didn't happen in a
>> >>>> while
>> >>>> afairc), sometimes because a committer has a strong opinion about a
>> >>>> jira
>> >>>> issue that must go in the release, which puts us back to square
>> >>>> one.  All in
>> >>>> all the process for a release candidate takes 3-5 days.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Cheers,
>> >>>> Hadrian
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Dec 1, 2008, at 11:09 AM, Martin Gilday wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Speaking as an end user I'd quite like to see maintenance releases
>> >>>>> coming out of Camel.  You guys are really great at responding to
>> >>>>> users'
>> >>>>> feedback and fixing bugs but that is in vain if they have to wait
>> >>>>> for 3
>> >>>>> months until the next major rlease.  Users can be uncomfotable
>> running
>> >>>>> against snapshots in production, so a fix release every month or so
>> >>>>> would make us feel cosy.  As Maven is being used is there much more
>> to
>> >>>>> releasing other than a few svn copy commands and a maven deploy?
>> >>>>> If it
>> >>>>> is seen as a hassle then can we look at simplifying it so that it
>> can
>> >>>>> happen more often without taking up committers time?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> ----- Original message -----
>> >>>>> From: "Jon Anstey" <[email protected]>
>> >>>>> To: [email protected]
>> >>>>> Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 10:13:38 -0330
>> >>>>> Subject: Re: Release camel 1.5.1 this month?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Do you think we need another release so soon? We just released 1.5 a
>> >>>>> month
>> >>>>> ago :) I'm just saying its a bit of work for you to put a release
>> out,
>> >>>>> isn't
>> >>>>> it?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea <
>> [email protected]>
>> >>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> There are 57 issues fixed on the 1.5.1 branch so far and a few more
>> >>>>>> coming
>> >>>>>> in the following couple of weeks.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I'd suggest releasing a 1.5.1 before the end of the month.  What
>> >>>>>> do you
>> >>>>>> think?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Hadrian
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> Cheers,
>> >>>>> Jon
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> http://janstey.blogspot.com/
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >> /Claus Ibsen
>> >> Apache Camel Committer
>> >> Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Jon
>
> http://janstey.blogspot.com/
>



-- 
Cheers,
Jon

http://janstey.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to