Can't we rename the page to 1.6 and add a note like " due to the large
number of fixes we bumped up the version..." ?
Hadrian
On Dec 17, 2008, at 7:31 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:46 AM, James Strachan
<[email protected]> wrote:
Looking at the 89 issues in 1.5.1, there's quite a few improvements
and new features. I wonder if we should call it 1.6?
Yeah many other frameworks etc. that have even fewer tickets in the
roadmap will bump the version to 1.6.
I guess since we have stated 1.5.1 in the wiki doc and if we call it
1.6 then end users will still know/assume that this also applies to
1.6
2008/12/17 Claus Ibsen <[email protected]>:
Hadrian
Any update on when you have the time to cut a 1.5.1 RC?
We have some rather important bunch of fixes in it.
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Claus Ibsen
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi
I think we should start getting a RC for 1.5.1 out of the door
this or
start of next week.
/Claus Ibsen
Apache Camel Committer
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea
<[email protected]> wrote:
Producing the kit is not the main issue. Quite a few of us
spend time
downloading the rc, running the demos, looking at content of the
distro,
checking if all the artifacts are there, the manual is generated
ok and so
forth. This is time consuming. Then there is the voting process.
Sometimes we get -1s for a bad kit (although that didn't happen
in a while
afairc), sometimes because a committer has a strong opinion
about a jira
issue that must go in the release, which puts us back to square
one. All in
all the process for a release candidate takes 3-5 days.
Cheers,
Hadrian
On Dec 1, 2008, at 11:09 AM, Martin Gilday wrote:
Speaking as an end user I'd quite like to see maintenance
releases
coming out of Camel. You guys are really great at responding
to users'
feedback and fixing bugs but that is in vain if they have to
wait for 3
months until the next major rlease. Users can be uncomfotable
running
against snapshots in production, so a fix release every month
or so
would make us feel cosy. As Maven is being used is there much
more to
releasing other than a few svn copy commands and a maven
deploy? If it
is seen as a hassle then can we look at simplifying it so that
it can
happen more often without taking up committers time?
----- Original message -----
From: "Jon Anstey" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 10:13:38 -0330
Subject: Re: Release camel 1.5.1 this month?
Do you think we need another release so soon? We just released
1.5 a
month
ago :) I'm just saying its a bit of work for you to put a
release out,
isn't
it?
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea <[email protected]
>
wrote:
There are 57 issues fixed on the 1.5.1 branch so far and a few
more
coming
in the following couple of weeks.
I'd suggest releasing a 1.5.1 before the end of the month.
What do you
think?
Hadrian
--
Cheers,
Jon
http://janstey.blogspot.com/
--
/Claus Ibsen
Apache Camel Committer
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
--
James
-------
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
Open Source Integration
http://fusesource.com/
--
/Claus Ibsen
Apache Camel Committer
Blog: http://davsclaus.blogspot.com/
