I *love* Camino, but it sounds like you want Firefox + Firebug,  
despite your desire not to use a second browser. You should look into  
it.


--
m-s

On 23 Jan, 2008, at 20:04, boby wrote:

> thx for this nice answer, in my case, i just want simplify my
> developpement for debug my JS/CSS scripts whithout another browser or
> using the console. Maybe afterwards, if i have the level to do, make a
> plugin to view a console into Camino itself.
> thanx for these informations.
>
> Boby
>
> Le 24 janv. 08 à 01:42, Stuart Morgan a écrit :
>
>> The reason I asked why you want to do it is that each of the examples
>> you give is actually asking for something different, and they have
>> different solutions:
>>
>>> this is interesting for make a 3rd party JS/CSS debugger without
>>> parse
>>> any system log file.
>>
>> If that's the case, then you want a way to direct JS/CSS errors from
>> Camino to a specific file, not to redirect the logging for Camino,
>> since you don't want things like multiple class declaration warnings
>> to show up in a third-party JS debugger.
>>
>> It's pretty easy to do this with an InputManager; that's how
>> ChimericalConsole works. As we start to build a supported extension
>> framework, that's something that's very likely to be formalized.
>>
>>> this is interesting for clean system.log without any errors of  
>>> camino
>>> except for crashing or kernel panic.
>>
>> For this case, you really do want everything. That can't be  
>> controlled
>> by Camino, since many of the messages that are logged from Camino are
>> generated by OS code, and we can't change what they log to. In that
>> case, you'd need to change the log handling at the system level  
>> (using
>> something like ASL), or run Camino inside of a wrapper that redirects
>> standard out and standard error.
>>
>> This also gets back to my point that we'd like to know about
>> problematic log messages, since we don't intend Camino to be chatty.
>> In general, we don't want to be logging for anything but a very
>> serious error.
>>
>>> this is interesting for identify the user who have the error.
>>
>> This doesn't require any changes, since as a user-level process,
>> Camino log messages go to the console for that user.
>>
>>
>> So without knowing what you actually want out of this, it's hard to
>> suggest the best way to accomplish it.
>>
>> -Stuart
>> _______________________________________________
>> Camino mailing list
>> Camino@mozdev.org
>> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Camino mailing list
> Camino@mozdev.org
> https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino

_______________________________________________
Camino mailing list
Camino@mozdev.org
https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/camino

Reply via email to