On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:32:31PM +0000, Richard Jones wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 01:15:39PM +0100, David Teller wrote: > > Do you see any better way of managing the complexity of all this? > > I'm still not getting where the benefit of having this hierarchy is, > except that it adds a Java-like complexity and will create > hard-to-manage churn if a module ever moves.
Regarding the advantages see my previous post, where I put some motivations. Regarding the difficulties of moving modules around, how harder is than moving a module around when you have no hierarchy? -- Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 [EMAIL PROTECTED],pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/ Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime _______________________________________________ Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
