> Sure, and maybe it doesn't really need to be process-persistent. Wouldn't that limit you to non-load-balanced apps, since you could only have one simultaneous process if you want session consistency?
Evan On 10/5/07, why the lucky stiff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 06:08:12PM +0200, Jonas Pfenniger wrote: > > I like the idea pretty much. What do you think of simply using a > > Camping::H that is process-persistent ? > > Sure, and maybe it doesn't really need to be process-persistent. > Yes, that would be how Camping would want us to do it. > > _why > _______________________________________________ > Camping-list mailing list > Camping-list@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list > -- Evan Weaver Cloudburst, LLC _______________________________________________ Camping-list mailing list Camping-list@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
