On 7-okt-2007, at 18:55, Jonas Pfenniger wrote: > 2007/10/5, why the lucky stiff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 06:08:12PM +0200, Jonas Pfenniger wrote: >>> I like the idea pretty much. What do you think of simply using a >>> Camping::H that is process-persistent ? >> >> Sure, and maybe it doesn't really need to be process-persistent. > > How can it be less than process-persistent ? Instance persistent ? Or > is it irony and it means not persistent at all ? :p
As mentioned previously, you have cliented sessions with signing - but then you are limited to the cookie size minus the signature. Personally I'm all for different session drivers - some kind of agreement what a session should and sould not do perhaps? Then you can plug session/cookies, session/files or session/db at your heart's content. The thing of note is that I think it should be configurable per app (because some apps have different session size requirements, and some apps would not want to reveal the session content in a cookie). -- Julian 'Julik' Tarkhanov please send all personal mail to me at julik.nl _______________________________________________ Camping-list mailing list Camping-list@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
