I took it to mean "persistent across processes" not "persistent per-process".
Evan On 10/7/07, Jonas Pfenniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2007/10/5, why the lucky stiff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 06:08:12PM +0200, Jonas Pfenniger wrote: > > > I like the idea pretty much. What do you think of simply using a > > > Camping::H that is process-persistent ? > > > > Sure, and maybe it doesn't really need to be process-persistent. > > How can it be less than process-persistent ? Instance persistent ? Or > is it irony and it means not persistent at all ? :p > > -- > Cheers, > zimbatm > _______________________________________________ > Camping-list mailing list > Camping-list@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list > -- Evan Weaver Cloudburst, LLC _______________________________________________ Camping-list mailing list Camping-list@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/camping-list
