Mike Stevens wrote: > That's one view. The opposite one (often voiced on Narrowboatworld.com)is > that continuous cruisers who don't pay for a mooring aren't paying their > share of the cost of running the system.
I can't see the need for CCs to pay a share of moorings they're not using ;-) If the argument is actually that a proportion of what is currently the mooring fee should be part of the licence fee instead, so that everyone (including all those who pay nothing to BW for their mooring, which is a lot more than just the CCs) pays more towards the upkeep of the system as opposed to the upkeep of individual moorings then lets have that debate instead... Steve NB Bream (not CCing at present)
