--- In [email protected], "Tony Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
> snip
> 
> If BW are having these problems it is no wonder ordinary boaters 
> (well me) are very sceptical over just how much effort BW are 
putting 
> into the enforcement effect it is having.
> 
> It is a clear as day that a number of boaters have no intention of 
> licensing their boats, paying their mooring permit (if applicable) 
> and displaying the said items. If anyone doubts this take a look 
> along the South Oxford & K&A.
> 
> If all these officers and wardens are not figments of a PR mans 
> imagination equip them with some sticky see through bags and "foil 
> anti forgery" printed headed notices. Simply stick a notice on 
> windows on both sides of the boat showing the current "state of 
play".
> 
> If the boaters do not like it they only have themselves to blame - 
> they are the ones breaking the regulations, and those with a 
genuine 
> reason for not displaying should be happy another problem has been 
> solved for them.
> 
> 
> I also note the increase in offside on-line moorings, some with 
> extensive dredging, earthworks and gardens (South Oxford). How 
does 
> this sit with BWs statements about reducing them - have the 
> moorers/land owners actually got BW permission or have they just 
done 
> it and are relying upon the "its my home" defence allow them to 
> continue to ignore BW regs?
> 
> Tony Brooks
>
I know stuff seems slow of the mark but in some areas there has been 
a lot of stuff to tackle. It's not just a PR dream. Lots of evidence 
has been gathered over the last few months and the volume of 
evidence is getting bigger and bigger and bigger especially in some 
areas where extra resources have been allocated in terms of 
staffing. Initial results are going to be announced soon. Times are 
a changing, slowly and surely with due regard to people's human 
rights and the due process of the law which as a public body BW is 
duty bound to comply with.

You call always PM me.
D :-)

Reply via email to