Jason, Jason, Yiu,
Based on the previous email thread, may I suggest a couple of items to improve the BoF proposal (wiki/agenda) ? - I guess that there will be more than 50 people based on the initial reactions - adding capport as conflict to be avoided for the BoF - adding a link to draft-lee-randomized-macaddr-ps - assuming that it is too early to form a WG, please state the status of ‘non WG forming’ - putting the description & agenda on the wiki https://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki before this Friday 2nd of October deadline - starting to find a potential chair who is not a proponent - Adding discussion about privacy impact on the agenda is important or even critical - adding IEEE coordination is also important (could be handled before the potential BoF) More specific to draft-lee-randomized-macaddr-ps-01, here are a couple of comments (mostly details): * MAC addresses are not always 48 bits long * MAC addresses are not always assigned by manufacturers (think VM) * Suggest to distinguish between ‘stable’ and ‘static’ and ‘persistent’ MAC address * Of course BCP 14 is no more RFC 2119 ;-) * PS-04 is more a requirement than a problem statement Hope this helps and happy to continue the discussion of course ;-) -éric
_______________________________________________ Captive-portals mailing list Captive-portals@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals
