Hi Glenn,

Yes, that is the plan, but we have some issues using snap blocks
independent of this. Hence, wanted to know if someone has seen such
behavior before as we continue to probe as you have suggested.

Thanks,

Nimish

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:22 PM, G Jones <glenn.calt...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Nimish,
> My suggestion is to add snapshot blocks triggered on the sync pulse
> directly after the FFT and after the blocks that follow it. You can
> then look at the signal at each stage and see at which stage that
> strange behavior is occurring. You can also add a "test vector
> generator" that puts in a known sequence and see if what comes out
> matches what you expect.
>
> Glenn
>
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Nimish Sane <nimish.s...@njit.edu> wrote:
> > Hi all:
> >
> > I am attaching a plot for Power of two inputs vs frequency channels. As
> can
> > be seen, we have this persistent problem where some channels at the end
> just
> > do not make any sense. We suspect that there is something going wrong in
> the
> > FFT block. Has anybody seen such behavior before or can think of what
> may be
> > going wrong?
> >
> > Following are some specifications that may be useful:
> > Hardware: ROACH2 with KATADC.
> > ADC Clock: 800 MHz,
> > FPGA clock: 200 MHz
> > Toolflow: XSG 11.5 with Matlab 2009b with RHEL5.8
> > Libraries: SKA
> > FFT green block: fft_wideband_real
> > FFT size: 2^13 (4096 Output channels)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Nimish
> > --
> > Nimish Sane
> >
> > Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research
> > New Jersey Institute of Technology
> > University Heights
> >
> > Newark, NJ 07102-1982 USA
> >
> > Tel: (973) 642 4958
> >
> > Fax: (973) 596 3617
> >
> > nimish.s...@njit.edu
>



-- 
Nimish Sane

Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research
New Jersey Institute of Technology
University Heights

Newark, NJ 07102-1982 USA

Tel: (973) 642 4958

Fax: (973) 596 3617
nimish.s...@njit.edu

Reply via email to