I have updated to the latest mlib_devel, and installed the 14.4. I cannot run the simulation because my MATLAB 8.0 doesn't have yet the DSP Toolbox needed for the downsampler into the iADC block, anyway I found a difference with the past version, the actual ADC block takes in input just three simulation signals rather than four. I have posted the new screenshot on http://www.med.ira.inaf.it/~mattana/casper/ .
Do you think I will be able to simulate/compiling it replacing the downsampler block using the simulink downsampler without having installed the DSP Toolbox?! (I need to check to the mail archive because somebody has notified me some weeks ago). Cheers, Andrea 2013/4/4 Wesley New <wes...@ska.ac.za>: > Hi Andrea > > I have simulated the sync pulse with out any issues on the latest version of > the ska-mlib_devel libraries with matlab 2012b and Xilinx 14.4 > > I have taken your design and put a scope on the output of the OR block and > it looks fine. > > Regards > > Wes > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Andrea Mattana <matt...@ira.inaf.it> wrote: >> >> Hi Dave, >> >> here (http://www.med.ira.inaf.it/~mattana/casper/) you can find a >> screenshot and the model file. I did this simulation because I see the >> same problem on the running project on my ROACH1 board (the pps >> connected to a led is not blinking anymore). The same simulation is >> working nominally using the very old 7.1 libraries, I'm using the >> ska-sa 14.2 toolflow with mlib_devel updated from git on Tue March 5 >> 14:54:36 2013 (commit from wnew). >> >> PPS line in our lab is inverted. >> >> Cheers, >> Andrea >> >> >> 2013/4/3 David MacMahon <dav...@astro.berkeley.edu>: >> > Hi, Andrea, >> > >> > Are you seeing problems in simulation or on actual hardware? I just >> > made a quick test model and the sync input was propagated fine in >> > simulation. Can you please explain your symptoms in more detail? Which >> > version of mlib_devel are you using? What hardware platform are you >> > targeting? >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Dave >> > >> > On Apr 3, 2013, at 7:16 AM, Andrea Mattana wrote: >> > >> >> Does anybody have tested the sync line (pps) on the iadc of the new >> >> toolflow? >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Andrea >> >> >> >> 2013/3/27 Andrea Mattana <matt...@ira.inaf.it>: >> >>> Hi all, >> >>> >> >>> I have tested the PPS over the sync0-1-2-3 output port of the iADC on >> >>> the new libraries with a very simple design and it seems that the >> >>> simulated PPS in input is not propagated anymore. >> >>> >> >>> I have tested a very similar model file on a old Ibob toolflow and it >> >>> works fine. >> >>> >> >>> There are any new constraints or it is just a bug (or better, I'm >> >>> wrong something?)?? >> >>> >> >>> Cheers, >> >>> Andrea >> >> >> >
