Hi Kim

This is a valid point. Rev 2 is shipping from now on, so the yellow blocks
should conform to that.

Regards
Henno


On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 4:33 AM, KimGuzzino <kguzz...@hawaii.edu> wrote:

> Henno,
>      Homin informed me that the hw_route.m for the Roach1 and Roach2
> both have 10-19 swapped with 20-29. That is where my problem came from.
> The data lines were ok because I had use the old roach1 declarations.
>  But for some of the new 10g control lines I used what was on the
> schematic for the pair assigned, which were wrong/swapped.
>  Maybe others that have made yellow blocks for the ZDOK interfaces had
> made the swapped assumption, I didn't.
>  I'm not sure where to note this, or change this, as it would break all
> of the existing yellow block interfaces to existing ZDOKS.
>  Also putting a different ucf file for Rev1 and Rev2 doesn't resolve the
> issue. I think a new hw_route.m is needed for each rev.
>  So , don't worry about me , it is just that others may have some
> similar confusion as I had.
>
> Thanks,
> Kim
>
>
>  for On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 06:31 +0200, Henno Kriel wrote:
> > Hi Kim
> >
> >
> > Wesley updated the hardware routes and UCF for rev2 - Wesley
> > please check.
> >
> >
> > Omer did the Roach 2 Rev 2 schematics & PCB updates - Omer please send
> > Kim the netlist and schematic.
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > HK
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Matt Dexter <mdex...@berkeley.edu>
> > wrote:
> >         Hi Kim,
> >
> >         Maybe I've been able to ignore some detail you are
> >         fighting against...
> >
> >         It's always good to get officially blessed
> >         design files.
> >
> >         for what it's worth
> >         the Roach2 rev1 and Roach2 rev2 schematics and altium
> >         files that I got from GIT and wiki match as far as I've found
> >         the
> >         boards that I debug at Digicom and in our lab.
> >         These are the files that I've been told to use by
> >         more than 1 of the SA board designers.
> >
> >         Matt
> >
> >
> >
> >         On Thu, 9 May 2013, KimGuzzino wrote:
> >
> >
> >                 Date: Thu, 09 May 2013 11:31:23 -0700
> >                 From: KimGuzzino <kguzz...@hawaii.edu>
> >                 To: Matt Dexter <mdex...@berkeley.edu>
> >
> >                 Subject: Re: [casper] Roach2 Rev2 Pinouts
> >
> >
> >                 Thanks Matt,
> >
> >                 Thats all well and good but even the file
> >
> https://casper.berkeley.edu/wiki/images/6/6e/ZDok_pins_diff_rev2_2013apr24.pdf
> >                 doesn't match the hw_routes file.
> >                 I really need the real schematic that was used to make
> >                 the board and or
> >                 the netlist.
> >
> >                 Henno..
> >                  Can you send me the netlist and schematic that was
> >                 sent and used by
> >                 Digicom to make the board? I don't want a link to a
> >                 file that is on the
> >                 Casper website as I don't know where they came from.
> >
> >                 Thanks again
> >                 Kim
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >                 On Thu, 2013-05-09 at 09:04 -0700, Matt Dexter wrote:
> >
> >                         from
> >
> https://casper.berkeley.edu/wiki/ROACH-2_Revision_2#Schematics
> >                         are Roach2 rev2
> >
> https://github.com/ska-sa/roach2_hardware/blob/master/release/rev2/A/ASSEMBLY/roach2_rev2_sch$
> >
> >                         from
> >
> https://casper.berkeley.edu/wiki/ROACH2#Schematics
> >                         Roach2 rev 1
> >
> https://casper.berkeley.edu/wiki/images/a/a5/Roach2_rev1_schematics.pdf
> >
> >                         Matt
> >
> >
> >                         PS. the ADC16 wiki pages have all sorts of
> >                         files
> >                         on ZDok+ pin changes which we've found to be
> >                         helpful.
> >                         for example:
> >
> https://casper.berkeley.edu/wiki/ADC16x250-8_differential_rev_2#ADC16x250-8_differential_rev_$
> >
> >                         or more specifically
> >
> https://casper.berkeley.edu/wiki/images/6/6e/ZDok_pins_diff_rev2_2013apr24.pdf
> >
> https://casper.berkeley.edu/wiki/images/2/2d/Host_clock_pins_2013feb05.txt
> >
> >
> >
> >                         On Thu, 9 May 2013, Kim Guzzino wrote:
> >
> >                                 Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 08:34:06 -0700
> >                                 From: Kim Guzzino
> >                                 <kguzz...@hawaii.edu>
> >                                 To: 'Henno Kriel' <he...@ska.ac.za>
> >                                 Cc: 'casper'
> >                                 <casper@lists.berkeley.edu>
> >                                 Subject: Re: [casper] Roach2 Rev2
> >                                 Pinouts
> >
> >
> >                                 Thanks Henno.
> >
> >                                  That is the repo I was using.
> >
> >                                  There are some differences  with the
> >                                 commented out adc pins in the UCF and
> >                                 the mat file,
> >                                 but I guess they don’t matter much.
> >
> >                                    But, there IS a difference in the
> >                                 schematic to the hw-route file. DP 18
> >                                  swapped with
> >                                 28 and  19 swapped with 29.
> >
> >                                 Is the schematic of the rev 1 and rev2
> >                                 on the casper site correct?
> >
> >
> >
> >                                 Thanks for the reply
> >
> >                                 Kim
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >                                 From: Henno Kriel
> >                                 [mailto:he...@ska.ac.za]
> >                                 Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2013 9:33 PM
> >                                 To: KimGuzzino
> >                                 Subject: Re: [casper] Roach2 Rev2
> >                                 Pinouts
> >
> >
> >
> >                                 Hi Kim
> >
> >
> >
> >                                 Just check your hw_routes.mat & ucf
> >                                 file with the SKA-SA repo - there was
> >                                 changes to the
> >                                 ZDOK routing on Rev2.
> >
> >
> >
> >                                 Regards
> >
> >                                 Henno
> >
> >
> >
> >                                 On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 10:03 PM,
> >                                 KimGuzzino <kguzz...@hawaii.edu>
> >                                 wrote:
> >
> >                                 Dear Casperites,
> >
> >                                   I was having problems with the pin
> >                                 mappings for the Roach2 Rev 2 using
> >                                 ZDOK pair declarations in my yellow
> >                                 block xps_10gadc.m file. I requested
> >                                 one to use pair 18 and it mapped to
> >                                 28.( both ZDOKS) and maps to 28 and
> >                                 29  a appear on 18 and 19
> >                                 respectively.  I looked at the
> >                                 hw_routes.mat
> >                                 file and it looks correct. I had to
> >                                 put the pinouts in my gen_ucf.m
> >                                 file.
> >                                   Has anyone seen such a problem?
> >                                  I am using 2009b , 14.4 and
> >                                 mlib_devel-master that I pulled last
> >                                 week
> >                                 from github.
> >
> >                                 Kim
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >                                 --
> >                                 Henno Kriel
> >
> >                                 DSP Engineer
> >
> >                                 Digital Back End
> >
> >                                 meerKAT
> >
> >                                 SKA South Africa
> >                                 Third Floor
> >                                 The Park
> >                                 Park Road (off Alexandra Road)
> >                                 Pinelands
> >                                 7405
> >                                 Western Cape
> >                                 South Africa
> >
> >                                 Latitude: -33.94329 (South);
> >                                 Longitude: 18.48945 (East).
> >
> >                                 (p) +27 (0)21 506 7300
> >                                 (p) +27 (0)21 506 7365 (direct)
> >                                 (f) +27 (0)21 506 7375
> >                                 (m) +27 (0)84 504 5050
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Henno Kriel
> >
> > DSP Engineer
> > Digital Back End
> > meerKAT
> >
> > SKA South Africa
> > Third Floor
> > The Park
> > Park Road (off Alexandra Road)
> > Pinelands
> > 7405
> > Western Cape
> > South Africa
> >
> > Latitude: -33.94329 (South); Longitude: 18.48945 (East).
> >
> > (p) +27 (0)21 506 7300
> > (p) +27 (0)21 506 7365 (direct)
> > (f) +27 (0)21 506 7375
> > (m) +27 (0)84 504 5050
>
>
>


-- 
Henno Kriel

DSP Engineer
Digital Back End
meerKAT

SKA South Africa
Third Floor
The Park
Park Road (off Alexandra Road)
Pinelands
7405
Western Cape
South Africa

Latitude: -33.94329 (South); Longitude: 18.48945 (East).

(p) +27 (0)21 506 7300
(p) +27 (0)21 506 7365 (direct)
(f) +27 (0)21 506 7375
(m) +27 (0)84 504 5050

Reply via email to