Matt S Trout wrote:
I was thinking about yours but can I get away with asking for all of the above? Given myself and kieren both find most of the other sites objectionable it'd be nice to see why you prefer them.
I think you're not the target audience that those sites are trying to reach. As someone else pointed out, those sites are designed to appeal to the bosses who sign off on the decisions as much, if not not more so, than the developers who work with the framework.
You, or this list, needs to decide who the audience for the catalyst site is. If it's trying to persuade developers and management to switch to Catalyst then it needs to appeal to those people. By your very position you are in neither of those two groups so perhaps not in a good position to decide what would appeal to them :-)
obias's design is good if somewhat shamelessly derivative. That's a complement really as he's trying to speak the visual language that many people will expect to see.
BTW - I heartily recommend Web ReDesign: Workflow that Works (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Web-Redesign-Workflow-Voices-Matter/dp/0735714339/)
Form follows function, almost always :-) S. _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
