On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Tobias Kremer <l...@funkreich.de> wrote: > On 20.11.2008, at 21:16, Sergio Salvi wrote: >> >> I still think the final solution (besides finding a way to make >> find_or_create() atomic), is to store flash data the session row >> (either on the same column of session or on a new, dedicated column). > > Sergio++ > > FWIW, I rolled my own flash mechanism which does exactly that (store the > flash value in the session) and haven't looked back since. I've seen about 3 > duplicate entry errors in the last 3 months opposed to several hundreds a > week with C::P::Session's flash method. >
I've committed the "flash in session" patch, please try it out: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/pipermail/catalyst-dev/2008-December/001573.html Regards, Sergio Salvi > --Tobias > > > _______________________________________________ > List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk > Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst > Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ > Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/ > _______________________________________________ List: Catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk Listinfo: http://lists.scsys.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/catalyst Searchable archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/catalyst@lists.scsys.co.uk/ Dev site: http://dev.catalyst.perl.org/
