Looks like you've hit everything I normally see pinged by the Incubator PMC. Great work! I'm hoping we're the first project to clear a release the first try :-)
[x] +1 Go ahead with the release On 9/23/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ ] +1 Go ahead with the release [ ] 0 Don't know or care [ ] -1 Reject the release (explain why) I'd like to start a new vote on the 2.0.1 release. The new snapshots are posted here: http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.1/ These issues were addressed following comments after the first vote attempt: * Added license headers to a few source files that were missing them. * Moved all third-party dependency notes to the NOTICE file (I copied the structure from the Geronimo project - NOTICE file does not list third party licenses text, but mentions all included dependencies and their web sites). * Confirmed that we are allowed to distribute Eclipse icons (in binary form). * Added MD5 signatures for release artifacts. * Added PGP signatures for release artifacts. Please review the new files and cast your vote. (And here is my +1) Andrus On Sep 18, 2006, at 9:46 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > Committers and PPMC members, please review and vote on Cayenne > 2.0.1-incubating release. > > [ ] +1 Go ahead with the release > [ ] 0 Don't know or care > [ ] -1 Reject the release (explain why) > > > > * release files: http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.1/ > * release 2.0.1 is a full ASF-compliant equivalent of a non-ASF > Cayenne 1.2.1. > * the release has no known IP issues > * the release has no (L)GPL or other incompatible license dependencies > * the release is compliant with Apache guidelines (NOTICE, > DISCLAIMER, LICENSE files placement, "incubating" in the naming). > > Would be great to catch any inconsistencies now, before we send it > out for the Incubator PMC vote. > > Thanks > Andrus > >
