I am still +1 to a release. If we discover other problems, we'll fix them (part of the purpose of incubation, right?). I think we are in pretty good shape overall, but I haven't the time to do a thorough review. Are we going to wait until Bill gets back from vacation to get his vote?
Thanks, /dev/mrg On 9/23/06, Andrus Adamchik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The last problem is fixed and new files are uploaded, sorry for the mixup. Andrus On Sep 23, 2006, at 5:53 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > Wait a sec - found a last minute problem - third-party licenses > must go in the LICENSE file underneath Apache license. Fixing this > now... > > Andrus > > > On Sep 23, 2006, at 5:50 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > >> [ ] +1 Go ahead with the release >> [ ] 0 Don't know or care >> [ ] -1 Reject the release (explain why) >> >> >> I'd like to start a new vote on the 2.0.1 release. The new >> snapshots are posted here: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.1/ >> >> These issues were addressed following comments after the first >> vote attempt: >> >> * Added license headers to a few source files that were missing them. >> * Moved all third-party dependency notes to the NOTICE file (I >> copied the structure from the Geronimo project - NOTICE file does >> not list third party licenses text, but mentions all included >> dependencies and their web sites). >> * Confirmed that we are allowed to distribute Eclipse icons (in >> binary form). >> * Added MD5 signatures for release artifacts. >> * Added PGP signatures for release artifacts. >> >> Please review the new files and cast your vote. >> >> (And here is my +1) >> >> Andrus >> >> >> >> On Sep 18, 2006, at 9:46 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: >> >>> Committers and PPMC members, please review and vote on Cayenne >>> 2.0.1-incubating release. >>> >>> [ ] +1 Go ahead with the release >>> [ ] 0 Don't know or care >>> [ ] -1 Reject the release (explain why) >>> >>> >>> >>> * release files: http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.1/ >>> * release 2.0.1 is a full ASF-compliant equivalent of a non-ASF >>> Cayenne 1.2.1. >>> * the release has no known IP issues >>> * the release has no (L)GPL or other incompatible license >>> dependencies >>> * the release is compliant with Apache guidelines (NOTICE, >>> DISCLAIMER, LICENSE files placement, "incubating" in the naming). >>> >>> Would be great to catch any inconsistencies now, before we send >>> it out for the Incubator PMC vote. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Andrus >>> >>> >> >> > >
