Still +1
- Tore.
On Sep 23, 2006, at 23:50, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
[ ] +1 Go ahead with the release
[ ] 0 Don't know or care
[ ] -1 Reject the release (explain why)
I'd like to start a new vote on the 2.0.1 release. The new
snapshots are posted here:
http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.1/
These issues were addressed following comments after the first vote
attempt:
* Added license headers to a few source files that were missing them.
* Moved all third-party dependency notes to the NOTICE file (I
copied the structure from the Geronimo project - NOTICE file does
not list third party licenses text, but mentions all included
dependencies and their web sites).
* Confirmed that we are allowed to distribute Eclipse icons (in
binary form).
* Added MD5 signatures for release artifacts.
* Added PGP signatures for release artifacts.
Please review the new files and cast your vote.
(And here is my +1)
Andrus
On Sep 18, 2006, at 9:46 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
Committers and PPMC members, please review and vote on Cayenne
2.0.1-incubating release.
[ ] +1 Go ahead with the release
[ ] 0 Don't know or care
[ ] -1 Reject the release (explain why)
* release files: http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/2.0.1/
* release 2.0.1 is a full ASF-compliant equivalent of a non-ASF
Cayenne 1.2.1.
* the release has no known IP issues
* the release has no (L)GPL or other incompatible license
dependencies
* the release is compliant with Apache guidelines (NOTICE,
DISCLAIMER, LICENSE files placement, "incubating" in the naming).
Would be great to catch any inconsistencies now, before we send it
out for the Incubator PMC vote.
Thanks
Andrus
