Hi Jonas, To be clear, this is the description of the namespace:
"credit be given to copyright holder and/or author" according to view-source:https://creativecommons.org/schema.rdf So I read this as a binary that when present credit should be given. It does not specify a way to do that, and I think it shouldn't as well. Cheers, Maarten -- Kennisland | www.kennisland.nl | t +31205756720 | m +31643053919 | @mzeinstra On Jun 24, 2013, at 17:36 , Jonas Öberg <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > here's a question from IRC which was left hanging. Wondering if anyone here > has any thoughts about it :) > > 09:14 <jonaso> Been looking at > https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/372427 which uses ccREL cc:permits > and cc:requires to express licenses which are not CC licenses, ie., FAL. > They've coded FAL same as CC BY-SA > 09:14 <jonaso> I wonder if that's the intent: ns#Attribution has a specific > meaning in the CC vocabulary which is slightly different from FAL's > attribution requirement. > 09:15 <jonaso> So I wonder if we should think of ccREL ns#Attribution as > "requires some attribution, unspecified exactly how, what or when" or if > ns#Attribution should mean more exactly the terms of the CC licenses. > 09:16 <jonaso> In the latter case, I guess there should be a separate > vocabulary to express terms more closely to FAL and other licenses. > > > Sincerely, > Jonas > _______________________________________________ > cc-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel
_______________________________________________ cc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel
