This reminds me of the question the other week about cc:attributionURL vs xmpRights:WebStatement, where the response was that cc:attributionURL was related to the legal code of the license even though that wasn't fully expressed in the ccREL description. That made it map to the semantics of xmpRights:WebStatement.
cc:require cc:attribution seems to me to also be related to the legal code that specifies exactly what attribution means (e.g. 4b in http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode). Or is it intended to be the more generic term described in the RDF schema? /Peter On 24 June 2013 17:59, Maarten Zeinstra <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jonas, > > To be clear, this is the description of the namespace: > > "credit be given to copyright holder and/or author" according to > view-source:https://creativecommons.org/schema.rdf > > So I read this as a binary that when present credit should be given. It > does not specify a way to do that, and I think it shouldn't as well. > > Cheers, > > Maarten > * > > * > * > > -- > Kennisland > | www.kennisland.nl | t +31205756720 | m +31643053919 | @mzeinstra > > > * > > > On Jun 24, 2013, at 17:36 , Jonas Öberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > here's a question from IRC which was left hanging. Wondering if anyone > here has any thoughts about it :) > > 09:14 <jonaso> Been looking at > https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/372427 which uses ccREL > cc:permits and cc:requires to express licenses which are not CC licenses, > ie., FAL. They've coded FAL same as CC BY-SA > 09:14 <jonaso> I wonder if that's the intent: ns#Attribution has a > specific meaning in the CC vocabulary which is slightly different from > FAL's attribution requirement. > 09:15 <jonaso> So I wonder if we should think of ccREL ns#Attribution as > "requires some attribution, unspecified exactly how, what or when" or if > ns#Attribution should mean more exactly the terms of the CC licenses. > 09:16 <jonaso> In the latter case, I guess there should be a separate > vocabulary to express terms more closely to FAL and other licenses. > > > Sincerely, > Jonas > _______________________________________________ > cc-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > cc-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel > >
_______________________________________________ cc-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-devel
