Could you elaborate a little bit. I was under the impression that shape and
police functionality was very similar except that you queue via the shape
and you drop via the police. Now if you were to configure an action to shape
without the peak there is not burst beyond the cir but there will be queuing
just the same. If i do not configure the shape peak will it not take the cir
as the peak value by default. I could be wrong, what do you think Scott?

On 2/17/08, Scott Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It's not the "normal" way of looking at it, but you could certainly use
> the
> "shape peak" feature within MQC to achieve that goal.  While the main
> focus
> is to shape, it will also provide a "do not exceed" value that serves kind
> of as a limit!
>
> HTH,
>
>
> Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
> JNCIE-M
> #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
> CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
> VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
> IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
>
> A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> http://www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derek Winchester
> Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 6:23 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Shape vs Police question
>
> Someone asked me a very good question yesterday and I am still confused if
> I
> gave him the correct answer. He gave me a scenario that states that he has
> to limit all IP Precedence 3 traffic out of an interface to 256k, but he
> cannot use policing or rate-limiting. My answer was to use shaping. But
> from
> my experience, doesn't the word "limit" negates that as a possible answer?
> Even though you can use shaping to limit, I was always under the
> impression
> when studying for the CCIE that if they use the word limit that means no
> shaping. Can someone help ease my conscience?
>
>


-- 
Derek S. Winchester
www.myprofessorvoip.com
www.winchester1.com
www.derekspeaks.org

Reply via email to