If it were real life, and you really had more than 128k traffic to send, you
would find yourself with output drops on the interface as your rules
attempted to cram more bits into the line than were physically possible.
 
Don't break the laws of physics, it's not cool..   :)
 
HTH,
 
Scott

  _____  

From: Carlos Valero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 1:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Derek Winchester'; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Shape vs Police question


I have a silly question related to this.

What if my physical clock rate is 128K and I configure:

shape peak 80000

The max rate then would be: configure rate x (1 + Be/Bc) = 80,000 x 2 =
160,000

But I guess that the actual max rate will be dictated by the physical clock
rate!
So in in this it can't be over 128K.  Is that correct?



Scott Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

It's not the "normal" way of looking at it, but you could certainly use the
"shape peak" feature within MQC to achieve that goal. While the main focus
is to shape, it will also provide a "do not exceed" value that serves kind
of as a limit!

HTH,


Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, JNCIE-M
#153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor

A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
http://www.ipexpert.com





-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derek Winchester
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 6:23 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] Shape vs Police question

Someone asked me a very good question yesterday and I am still confused if I
gave him the correct answer. He gave me a scenario that states that he has
to limit all IP Precedence 3 traffic out of an interface to 256k, but he
cannot use policing or rate-limiting. My answer was to use shaping. But from
my experience, doesn't the word "limit" negates that as a possible answer?
Even though you can use shaping to limit, I was always under the impression
when studying for the CCIE that if they use the word limit that means no
shaping. Can someone help ease my conscience?





  _____  

Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51733/*http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8
HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ> it now.

Reply via email to