Hi Louis,

I asked myself the same question, since I'm not very "NAT-experienced" :o)
Well, to me, the solution with the NVI is easier to configure. My problem
is, that for some questions, for example Task 13.21, still the old, "nat
inside..." command synthax is use.
So how can we differentiate, when to use which solution?

Regards

Roger

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Louis S
Gesendet: Montag, 14. April 2008 19:16
An: [email protected]
Betreff: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPEXPERT Lab 13 Section 2 General Nat question

Hi all,

I was hoping someone can explain to me what would be
the deciding factor that led the PG to use the 

"Configuring the NAT Virtual Interface" approach (see
hyperlink):

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_4/ip_addr/configuration/guide/ntbaddr
s.html#wp1084652

as opposed to the older method in the "Configuring the
Inside Source Addresses" section of the same hyperlink




 
____________________________________________________________________________
________
Be a better friend, newshound, and 
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

Reply via email to