Hi Roger, I'm also pretty curious about this one. Honestly, I've only used "ip nat inside/outside". I noticed "ip nat enable" used a lot for solutions. I'm curious if there are any gotchas around this or reasons for using one over the other.
Ted ----- Original Message ---- From: Roger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Louis S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [email protected] Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 1:42:48 PM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPEXPERT Lab 13 Section 2 General Nat question Hi Louis, I asked myself the same question, since I'm not very "NAT-experienced" :o) Well, to me, the solution with the NVI is easier to configure. My problem is, that for some questions, for example Task 13.21, still the old, "nat inside..." command synthax is use. So how can we differentiate, when to use which solution? Regards Roger -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Louis S Gesendet: Montag, 14. April 2008 19:16 An: [email protected] Betreff: [OSL | CCIE_RS] IPEXPERT Lab 13 Section 2 General Nat question Hi all, I was hoping someone can explain to me what would be the deciding factor that led the PG to use the "Configuring the NAT Virtual Interface" approach (see hyperlink): http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_4/ip_addr/configuration/guide/ntbaddr s.html#wp1084652 as opposed to the older method in the "Configuring the Inside Source Addresses" section of the same hyperlink ____________________________________________________________________________ ________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
