Hey, Being connected to a switch makes no difference. On B and C you are only sending routes to each other and ONLY each other. The network statement on A only tells A to advertise the networks out an interface. It will not receive any routes though.
Regards, Joe Astorino - CCIE #24347 R&S Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Cell: +1.586.212.6107 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: Taqdir Singh <[email protected]> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 04:54:48 To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; CCIE OSL<[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] How to stop adverstising RIP Updates in thisscenario ? But Routers A , B and C are connected to Switch also. Router A Config router rip network 172.16.10.0 Router B config router rip network 172.16.10.0 neighbor 172.16.10.3 passive-interface se0/2 Router C config router rip network 172.16.10.0 neighbor 172.16.10.2 passive-interface se0/3 Now We have network command 172.16..10.0 at A as well on C. won't they share routes ? Please note they are connected to Switch. I am not sure .. but I will do this in lab. once I reach home. Sincerely, Taqdir Singh 91-9911709496 Do today what others won't So you can live tomorrow what others can't ________________________________ From: Joe Astorino <[email protected]> To: Taqdir Singh <[email protected]>; [email protected]; CCIE OSL <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, 16 August, 2009 11:05:09 PM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] How to stop adverstising RIP Updates in thisscenario ? No A would not receive routes. How would it if you are only unicasting between B and C? Regards, Joe Astorino - CCIE #24347 R&S Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Cell: +1.586.212.6107 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: [email protected] ________________________________ From: Taqdir Singh Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 04:30:00 +0530 (IST) To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; CCIE OSL<[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] How to stop adverstising RIP Updates in thisscenario ? Initially A B and C were sending updates to each other via broadcasts. Now if I will use unicast (neighbor + passive interface + network command) on B and C , still A will receive updates right , because A is already configured with network command , please advise ? Sincerely, Taqdir Singh 91-9911709496 Do today what others won't So you can live tomorrow what others can't ________________________________ From: Joe Astorino <[email protected]> To: Taqdir Singh <[email protected]>; [email protected]; CCIE OSL <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, 16 August, 2009 10:01:09 PM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] How to stop adverstising RIP Updates in thisscenario ? Use unicast only between b and c ------Original Message------ From: Taqdir Singh Sender: [email protected] To: CCIE OSL Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] How to stop adverstising RIP Updates in thisscenario ? Sent: Aug 16, 2009 5:51 PM Scenario below Routers A B and C are connected to a switch. RIP is running on all the routers. I do not have access to A,..... Sitting on C , how can I stop adverstisng RIP updates to router A ? Sincerely, Taqdir Singh 91-9911709496 Do today what others won't So you can live tomorrow what others can't ---------------- Love Cricket? Check out live scores, photos, video highlights and more. Click here <http://in.rd.yahoo.com/tagline_cricket_2/*http://cricket.yahoo.com> ._______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Regards, Joe Astorino - CCIE #24347 R&S Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Cell: +1.586.212.6107 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: [email protected] ________________________________ Yahoo! recommends that you upgrade to the new and safer Internet Explorer 8. See the Web's breaking stories, chosen by people like you. Check out Yahoo! Buzz. http://in.buzz.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
