Hey Kim,
Have you set RIP to use version 2 and no auto-summary?
If you dont have that set, RIP will never see a subnet other than at
class full boundaries?
Let us know!
-Adrian
On Aug 25, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Kim Pedersen wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> So i was playing around with RIP (As i usually do when im bored :) ),
> and i came across an issue where my results dont agree with the Cisco
> documentation. What im talking about is the manual summary ("ip
> summary-address rip <network> <mask>").
>
> According to:
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_1/iproute/command/reference/1rdrip.html#wp1025730
> The use of a manual summary address, should override the auto-summary
> functionality. This does not match up to what im able to lab up:
>
> R1 <-> R2 <-> R3.
>
> On R2, i have the 192.168.0.64/28 configured. between R2 and R3 is
> 172.16.0.0, so its a different major net. Rip should with autosummary
> summarize the 192.168.0.64 subnet to 255.255.255.0... This works
> perfectly.
>
> When i then try on the interface between R2 and R3, and do a "ip
> summary-address rip 192.168.0.64 255.255.255.128" it should override
> the
> autosummary, and send this network as a /25 instead of a /24.
>
> Anyone able to elaborate on this?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Sincerely,
> Kim Pedersen
>
> --
>
> // Freedom Matters
> // Follow my progress on: http://kpjungle.wordpress.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
