Hi,
Its not learning that address from that interface so split horizon is
not an issue. As you can see it advertises just fine, just the wrong
thing :)
Sincerely,
Kim Pedersen
Adrian Brayton wrote:
> I guess my next question is have you disabled split horizon on that
> interface?
>
> If you don't, it wont advertise the summary address!
>
> -Adrian
>
>
> On Aug 25, 2009, at 10:04 AM, Kim Pedersen wrote:
>
>> Hi Adrian (and Joe),
>>
>> To correct my summary, i actually had (though it wont have any
>> effect), " ip summary-address rip 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.128" which
>> is within the scope.
>>
>> Yes.. its version 2:
>> Automatic network summarization is in effect
>> Mar 1 01:26:40.955: RIP: build update entries
>> *Mar 1 01:26:40.959: 192.168.0.0/24 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0
>>
>> As you can see it still sends out with /24
>>
>> A bit weird.. also in the documentation i posted, they actually do
>> run V1 (send version 1 and receive 1 and 2)
>>
>> Adrian Brayton wrote:
>>> Hey Kim,
>>>
>>> Have you set RIP to use version 2 and no auto-summary?
>>>
>>> If you dont have that set, RIP will never see a subnet other than at
>>> class full boundaries?
>>>
>>> Let us know!
>>>
>>> -Adrian
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 25, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Kim Pedersen wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> So i was playing around with RIP (As i usually do when im bored :) ),
>>>> and i came across an issue where my results dont agree with the Cisco
>>>> documentation. What im talking about is the manual summary ("ip
>>>> summary-address rip <network> <mask>").
>>>>
>>>> According to:
>>>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_1/iproute/command/reference/1rdrip.html#wp1025730
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The use of a manual summary address, should override the auto-summary
>>>> functionality. This does not match up to what im able to lab up:
>>>>
>>>> R1 <-> R2 <-> R3.
>>>>
>>>> On R2, i have the 192.168.0.64/28 configured. between R2 and R3 is
>>>> 172.16.0.0, so its a different major net. Rip should with autosummary
>>>> summarize the 192.168.0.64 subnet to 255.255.255.0... This works
>>>> perfectly.
>>>>
>>>> When i then try on the interface between R2 and R3, and do a "ip
>>>> summary-address rip 192.168.0.64 255.255.255.128" it should
>>>> override the
>>>> autosummary, and send this network as a /25 instead of a /24.
>>>>
>>>> Anyone able to elaborate on this?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>> Kim Pedersen
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> // Freedom Matters
>>>> // Follow my progress on: http://kpjungle.wordpress.com
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> // Freedom Matters
>> // Follow my progress on: http://kpjungle.wordpress.com
>>
>
--
// Freedom Matters
// Follow my progress on: http://kpjungle.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
