I guess my next question is have you disabled split horizon on that
interface?
If you don't, it wont advertise the summary address!
-Adrian
On Aug 25, 2009, at 10:04 AM, Kim Pedersen wrote:
> Hi Adrian (and Joe),
>
> To correct my summary, i actually had (though it wont have any
> effect), " ip summary-address rip 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.128"
> which is within the scope.
>
> Yes.. its version 2:
> Automatic network summarization is in effect
> Mar 1 01:26:40.955: RIP: build update entries
> *Mar 1 01:26:40.959: 192.168.0.0/24 via 0.0.0.0, metric 1, tag 0
>
> As you can see it still sends out with /24
>
> A bit weird.. also in the documentation i posted, they actually do
> run V1 (send version 1 and receive 1 and 2)
>
> Adrian Brayton wrote:
>> Hey Kim,
>>
>> Have you set RIP to use version 2 and no auto-summary?
>>
>> If you dont have that set, RIP will never see a subnet other than
>> at class full boundaries?
>>
>> Let us know!
>>
>> -Adrian
>>
>>
>>
>> On Aug 25, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Kim Pedersen wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> So i was playing around with RIP (As i usually do when im
>>> bored :) ),
>>> and i came across an issue where my results dont agree with the
>>> Cisco
>>> documentation. What im talking about is the manual summary ("ip
>>> summary-address rip <network> <mask>").
>>>
>>> According to:
>>> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_1/iproute/command/reference/1rdrip.html#wp1025730
>>> The use of a manual summary address, should override the auto-
>>> summary
>>> functionality. This does not match up to what im able to lab up:
>>>
>>> R1 <-> R2 <-> R3.
>>>
>>> On R2, i have the 192.168.0.64/28 configured. between R2 and R3 is
>>> 172.16.0.0, so its a different major net. Rip should with
>>> autosummary
>>> summarize the 192.168.0.64 subnet to 255.255.255.0... This works
>>> perfectly.
>>>
>>> When i then try on the interface between R2 and R3, and do a "ip
>>> summary-address rip 192.168.0.64 255.255.255.128" it should
>>> override the
>>> autosummary, and send this network as a /25 instead of a /24.
>>>
>>> Anyone able to elaborate on this?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>> Kim Pedersen
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> // Freedom Matters
>>> // Follow my progress on: http://kpjungle.wordpress.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>>> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>>
>
> --
>
> // Freedom Matters
> // Follow my progress on: http://kpjungle.wordpress.com
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit
www.ipexpert.com
