Hi Juan, Yes, but try on R1 to use the auto-summary, which according to the text, should still be overridden with the more specific /25.
Kim Juan Pablo Corrales wrote: > Hi Kim, > > I just recreated and it´s working fine for me. See attached the > results in the picture. I used the following topology: > > R0 ---- 192.168.0.0/28---- <http://192.168.0.0/28----> R1 ---- > 172.16.0.0/16 <http://172.16.0.0/16> --------R2 > .1 -------------------------- .2 .1 ---------------------------- .2 > > Here are my configs: > > ****R0**** > int f0/0 > ip address 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.240 > > router rip > version 2 > no auto-summary > network 192.168.0.0 > > ****R1**** > int f0/0 > ip address 192.168.0.2 255.255.255.240 > > int f0/1 > ip address 172.16.0.1 255.255.0.0 > ip summary-address rip 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.128 > > router rip > version 2 > no auto-summary > network 192.168.0.0 > network 172.16.0.0 > > ****R2**** > int f0/0 > ip address 172.16.0.2 255.255.0.0 > > router rip > version 2 > no auto-summary > network 172.16.0.0 > > > On router R2 I can see in the routing table the route 192.168.0.0/25 > <http://192.168.0.0/25> > > Regards, > > Juan Corrales > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > -- // Freedom Matters // Follow my progress on: http://kpjungle.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
