Thanks lj, in this case the routes are statis redistributed so AD of  
170.

Interestingly, I just blew away the eigrp, replaced with ospf, and  
works fine....

Something is amiss... I will return my config and see if I can find  
the problem. I do think this should work!

Sent from my iPhone

On 8 Mar 2010, at 10:39, "LJ" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Mark,
>
> interesting stuff :)
>
> Your thought is right, this is what Cisco have to say (doccd):
>
> ---
>
> Examples
>
> The following example chooses an administrative distance of 110. In  
> this case, packets for network 10.0.0.0 will be routed to a router  
> at 172.31.3.4 if dynamic information with an administrative distance  
> less than 110 is not available.
>
> ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 172.31.3.4 110
>
> ---
>
> In your case you have an AD of 210 and EIGRP's AD is 90 which is  
> less than 210.. so EIGRP must
> win the match unless the prefix it receives is less specific.. but  
> that is not the case as you stated..
> Interesting stuff..
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 10:34:17 +0000
> Mark Beynon <[email protected]> wrote:
> : I have lab'd up a work solution in GNS, and it is not behaving how I
> : would expect. This has lead me to question my understanding some  
> what.
> : : The scenario, I have a router that learns the host route
> : 25.25.25.25/32 from eigrp. I then install a static to 25.25.25.25/32
> : on this router in the othe direction, with and AD of 210.
> : : As expected the Eigrp route makes it into the route table.  When I
> : down the eigrp route onward in the network, it is removed from  
> Eigrp,
> : and my static springs into life.
> : : But... When I reintroduce the route, the static with worse AD  
> stays in
> : the route table, despite it learning a route with better AD.
> : : I have run a debug and confirmed that eigrp is sending the  
> update to
> : this router. there is something I'm missing, and I think it is
> : understanding over config...
> : : Any ideas?
> : : Sent from my iPhone
> : _______________________________________________
> :For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
> please visit www.ipexpert.com
>
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to