When you know what was the cause please let me know :)

On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 11:41:53 +0000
  Mark Beynon <[email protected]> wrote:
: Thanks lj, in this case the routes are statis redistributed so AD of
: 170.
: 
: Interestingly, I just blew away the eigrp, replaced with ospf, and
: works fine....
: 
: Something is amiss... I will return my config and see if I can find
: the problem. I do think this should work!
: 
: Sent from my iPhone
: 
: On 8 Mar 2010, at 10:39, "LJ" <[email protected]> wrote:
: 
:> Hi Mark,
:>
:> interesting stuff :)
:>
:> Your thought is right, this is what Cisco have to say (doccd):
:>
:> ---
:>
:> Examples
:>
:> The following example chooses an administrative distance of 110. In
:> this case, packets for network 10.0.0.0 will be routed to a router
:> at 172.31.3.4 if dynamic information with an administrative distance
:> less than 110 is not available.
:>
:> ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 172.31.3.4 110
:>
:> ---
:>
:> In your case you have an AD of 210 and EIGRP's AD is 90 which is
:> less than 210.. so EIGRP must
:> win the match unless the prefix it receives is less specific.. but
:> that is not the case as you stated..
:> Interesting stuff..
:>
:>
:>
:>
:>
:> On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 10:34:17 +0000
:> Mark Beynon <[email protected]> wrote:
:> : I have lab'd up a work solution in GNS, and it is not behaving how I
:> : would expect. This has lead me to question my understanding some
:> what.
:> : : The scenario, I have a router that learns the host route
:> : 25.25.25.25/32 from eigrp. I then install a static to 25.25.25.25/32
:> : on this router in the othe direction, with and AD of 210.
:> : : As expected the Eigrp route makes it into the route table.  When I
:> : down the eigrp route onward in the network, it is removed from
:> Eigrp,
:> : and my static springs into life.
:> : : But... When I reintroduce the route, the static with worse AD
:> stays in
:> : the route table, despite it learning a route with better AD.
:> : : I have run a debug and confirmed that eigrp is sending the
:> update to
:> : this router. there is something I'm missing, and I think it is
:> : understanding over config...
:> : : Any ideas?
:> : : Sent from my iPhone
:> : _______________________________________________
:> :For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
:> please visit www.ipexpert.com
:>
: _______________________________________________
:For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please 
visit www.ipexpert.com

_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to