Looking at the initial configs for lab 8 I'm seeing the following

R2

interface Serial0/1/0.24 point-to-point
description Frame Relay Cloud 2
ip address 150.100.24.2 255.255.255.0
frame-relay interface-dlci 204

R4

interface Serial0/0/0
ip address 150.100.24.4 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay lmi-type cisco
no shut

So you are correct in that it looks like R4 is using inverse-arp

So please post the output from the commands on R4

show frame pvc | in ACT
show frame map

Thanks!


From: Di Bias, Steve
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 9:16 AM
To: 'Nilesh Mehta'
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_RS] WB1 - LAB8 -Task 1-2

On both R2 and R4 run the following commands and post the output

show frame pvc | in ACT
show frame map

Thanks!

Steve

From: Nilesh Mehta [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 9:12 AM
To: Di Bias, Steve
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] WB1 - LAB8 -Task 1-2

NO even I am not able to ping. but interface shows up/up status.Looks like its 
issue with frame relay interface. By default initial config for lab 8  does not 
map frame interface properly and its use inverse ARP by default and  we do not 
have mapping statement for frame interface.
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Di Bias, Steve 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Can you ping 150.100.24.4 from R2?


From: Nilesh Mehta [mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 4:13 PM
To: Di Bias, Steve
Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] WB1 - LAB8 -Task 1-2

All the loopback addresses in routing table  except only R4. I can ping to all 
loopback from R1to R9 but not routes for 200.0.0.4
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Di Bias, Steve 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Well you are advertising 200.0.0.0 in RIP so what do you see on R2 when you 
issue the following command

"show ip route 200.0.0.4"

Steve

From: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>]
 On Behalf Of Nilesh Mehta
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 1:59 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_RS] WB1 - LAB8 -Task 1-2


I was trying to setup neighbor adjacency between R2 and R4. I have same 
configuration as per DSG
but I was not able to connect  R4 loop back's address. R4's  loop back address 
never appeared  in routing table
(200.0.0.4).I have both up/up status for serial link on both side and  I  tried 
with  no validate source command on R4 and split horizon on R2 but it did not 
work. Not sure what could be problem? Any one has this problem earlier ? Please 
let me know
Thanks--Nilesh
----------------------------------------------------------
R4(config-router)#do sh run | s rip
router rip
version 2
passive-interface default
no passive-interface Serial0/0/0
network 150.100.0.0
network 200.0.0.0
no auto-summary
-----------------------------------

R2#sh run | s rip
description Ethernet Link to R1
description Frame Relay Links
description Frame Relay Cloud 2
description Frame Relay Cloud 1
description Serial Link to R5
router rip
version 2
 passive-interface default
no passive-interface GigabitEthernet0/0
no passive-interface Serial0/1/0.24
no passive-interface Serial0/1/0.256
no passive-interface Serial0/2/0
network 150.100.0.0
network 200.0.0.0
no auto-summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
R4#
*Oct  6 05:55:05.535: RIP: ignored v2 update from bad source 150.100.100.5 on 
Serial0/0/0
R4#
*Oct  6 05:55:09.179: RIP: ignored v2 update from bad source 150.100.100.6 on 
Serial0/0/0
R4#
*Oct  6 05:55:10.587: RIP: sending v2 update to 224.0.0.9 via Serial0/0/0 
(150.100.24.4)
*Oct  6 05:55:10.587: RIP: build update entries
*Oct  6 05:55:10.587:   150.100.24.0/24<http://150.100.24.0/24> via 0.0.0.0, 
metric 1, tag 0
*Oct  6 05:55:10.587:   150.100.40.0/24<http://150.100.40.0/24> via 0.0.0.0, 
metric 1, tag 0
*Oct  6 05:55:10.587:   150.100.41.0/24<http://150.100.41.0/24> via 0.0.0.0, 
metric 1, tag 0
*Oct  6 05:55:10.587:   200.0.0.4/32<http://200.0.0.4/32> via 0.0.0.0, metric 
1, tag 0
R4#
*Oct  6 05:55:35.139: RIP: ignored v2 update from bad source 150.100.100.5 on 
Serial0/0/0
R4#
*Oct  6 05:55:36.967: RIP: sending v2 update to 224.0.0.9 via Serial0/0/0 
(150.100.24.4)
*Oct  6 05:55:36.967: RIP: build update entries
*Oct  6 05:55:36.967:   150.100.24.0/24<http://150.100.24.0/24> via 0.0.0.0, 
metric 1, tag 0
*Oct  6 05:55:36.967:   150.100.40.0/24<http://150.100.40.0/24> via 0.0.0.0, 
metric 1, tag 0
*Oct  6 05:55:36.967:   150.100.41.0/24<http://150.100.41.0/24> via 0.0.0.0, 
metric 1, tag 0
*Oct  6 05:55:36.967:   200.0.0.4/32<http://200.0.0.4/32> via 0.0.0.0, metric 
1, tag 0
*Oct  6 05:55:37.483: RIP: ignored v2 update from bad source 150.100.100.6 on 
Serial0/0/0
R4#
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R2#
R2#*Oct  6 05:42:08.283: RIP: sending v2 update to 224.0.0.9 via Serial0/1/0.24 
(150.100.24.2)
*Oct  6 05:42:08.283: RIP: build update entries
*Oct  6 05:42:08.283:   66.0.0.0/8<http://66.0.0.0/8> via 0.0.0.0, metric 12, 
tag 0
*Oct  6 05:42:08.283:   66.110.173.0/24<http://66.110.173.0/24> via 0.0.0.0, 
metric 10, tag 0
*Oct  6 05:42:08.283:   66.203.191.0/24<http://66.203.191.0/24> via 0.0.0.0, 
metric 10, tag 0
*Oct  6 05:42:08.283:   100.0.0.0/8<http://100.0.0.0/8> via 0.0.0.0, metric 4, 
tag 0
*Oct  6 05:42:08.283:   100.100.100.0/24<http://100.100.100.0/24> via 0.0.0.0, 
metric 2, tag 0
*Oct  6 05:42:08.283:   150.100.12.0/24<http://150.100.12.0/24> via 0.0.0.0, 
metric 1, tag 0
*Oct  6 05:42:08.283:   150.100.24.0/24<http://150.100.24.0/24> via 0.0.0.0, 
metric 1, tag 0
*Oct  6 05:42:08.283:   150.100.25.0/24<http://150.100.25.0/24> via 0.0.0.0, 
metric 1, tag 0
*Oct  6 05:42:08.283:   150.100.69.0/24<http://150.100.69.0/24> via 0.0.0.0, 
metric 2, tag 0
*Oct  6 05:42:08.283:   150.100.78.0/24<http://150.100.78.0/24> via 0.0.0.0, 
metric 3, tag 0
*Oct  6 05:42:08.283:   150.100.81.0/24<http://150.100.81.0/24> via 0.0.0.0, 
metric 4, tag 0
*Oct  6 05:42:08.283:   150.100.91.0/24<http://150.100.91.0/24> via 0.0.0.0, 
metric 3, tag 0
*Oct  6 05:42:08.283:   150.100.100.0/24<http://150.100.100.0/24> via 0.0.0.0, 
metric 1, tag 0
*Oct  6 05:42:08.283:   150.100.220.0/24<http://150.100.220.0/24> via 0.0.0.0, 
metric 2, tag 0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------



UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is 
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
distribution of this information is prohibited, and may be punishable by law. 
If this was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and 
destroy all copies of the original message.




UHS Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is 
for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
distribution of this information is prohibited, and may be punishable by law. 
If this was sent to you in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and 
destroy all copies of the original message.



UHS Confidentiality Notice:  This e-mail message, including any attachments, is 
for the sole use of the intended recipient (s) and may contain confidential and 
privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or 
distribution of this information is prohibited.  If this was sent to you in 
error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the 
original message.
_______________________________________________
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Reply via email to